Today, shareholders of Keurig Green Mountain, (GMCR) woke up to a nice 75% pop in the value of their shares. A private equity firm is taking the company private for $13.9 billion or $92 a share. That’s made GMCR one of the biggest one day movers for an S&P 500 stock this year.
Most interesting, you could have participated in this huge winner.
Just last month, at “The Invest for Kids Chicago” hedge fund conference, Ricky Sandler of the $6.5 billion hedge fund, Eminence Capital, made a detailed presentation on why he thought Keurig Green Mountain was worth $85 to $100 a share. The stock was selling for around $50 at the time and Eminence owned $195,000,000 worth — the largest hedge fund owner of the stock.
Apparently the private equity firm JAB Capital agreed with Sandler. They paid a price at the mid-point of his valuation.
Now, if you were paying attention to this conference and bought the stock, clearly you could have made a lot of money. We attend or read the transcripts from every major hedge fund conference on the planet. These ideas are not often covered in the mainstream press or online media, and therefore are ripe for finding hidden investment gems like GMCR.
Today’s news is just one of many examples of stock takeovers that can be predicted by the presence of an influential investor. For example, just last month, at BillionairesPortfolio.com we predicted the takeover of MedAssets, thanks to the work and presence of activist investor Starboard Value (you can see those details here).
Of course, today’s star performer was Ricky Sandler and Eminence Capital. With that, here are the top 5 best ideas from Eminence Capital.
1) Zynga (ZNGA) – Another top idea Sadler presented at “The Invest for Kids Chicago” conference was Zynga. Sadler say Zynga is undervalued because it has $500 million in real estate (its San Francisco Headquarters) and a $1.15 in cash per share, meaning the market is valuing its underlying business for almost nothing. Sandler said if the stock were valued similar to its peer, King Digital, Zynga should be worth $5 a share or a double from its share price today.
2) AIG (AIG) – Another top idea of Eminence Capital is AIG. Eminence owns more than $350 million of AIG stock through a mix of shares and options, more than 5% of its portfolio. Billionaires Carl Icahn and John Paulson also own huge stakes in AIG and Icahn has said AIG could be worth as much as $100 a share or a 50% return from its share price today.
3) GNC (GNC) – GNC is the third largest position in Eminence Capital’s portfolio. It owns 6% of GNC. The stock is extremely undervalued as it has a forward P/E of 9, price to free cash flow of 11, and almost a 3% dividend. These valuation metrics put GNC in that “buyout candidate” territory, just like Keurig Green Mountain.
4) Men’s Wearhouse (MW) – Eminence Capital owns more than 8% of Men’s Wearhouse and has held onto the stock even as it’s been crushed. Men’s Wearhouse has dropped from $65 to $20 this year, making the stock very cheap. It has a price to sales of just .28. It sells below its book value. And it has a forward P/E of just 8 (about that of the S&P 500).
5) Autodesk (ADSK) – Eminence Capital’s top position is Autodesk. They own almost $300 million worth, making it nearly 5% of their portfolio. Autodesk is up 44% over the last 2 months, as it has been rumored to be another takeover candidate. A top $4 billion activist hedge fund, Sachem Head, owns 5.7% of the stock and launched an activist campaign on the company last month.
Billionairesportfolio.com, run by two veterans of the hedge fund industry, helps self-directed investors invest alongside the world’s best billionaire investors.
Goldman Sachs just released its most loved stocks list among the hedge fund community. Goldman narrows the thousands of stocks represented in the most recent quarterly 13F filings down to their “most important” 25. At Billionairesportfolio.com, we’ve narrowed that list down to the five stocks owned by billionaire hedge fund managers with the most potential upside.
Below are the five stocks:
1) Charter Communications (CHTR) – Charter is one of the top ten most owned stocks by hedge funds. Billionaire hedge fund managers Stephen Mandel of Lone Pine Capital and John Paulson own large stakes in Charter. Mandel owns more than $1 billion worth of Charter. At the recent Robin Hood Investment Conference, one of Paulson’s portfolio managers said Charter could be worth as much as $325 a share, nearly 75% higher than current levels.
2) Yahoo (YHOO) – Yahoo is another popular stock owned by billionaire hedge fund managers. Billionaire David Einhorn and Starboard Value, a top $5 billion activist hedge fund, both own big stakes in Yahoo. The average analyst price target for Yahoo is $49 or a 50% potential return from its current share price.
3) General Motors (GM) – Another popular billionaire owned stock in the Goldman Sachs VIP (very important position) list is GM. Billionaire hedge fund manager David Tepper owns GM. If fact, GM is David Tepper’s largest equity position in his hedge fund. The average analyst price target for GM is $50 or almost a 50% return from its current share price.
4) AIG (AIG) – Billionaires Carl Icahn and John Paulson are two of the largest holders of AIG. Both billionaires have pushed for AIG to break up and spin off business units. Icahn recently said that if AIG breaks into three companies the company could be worth more than $100 a share. That would be a 56% return from its current share price.
5) Apple (AAPL) – Billionaires Carl Icahn and David Einhorn both hold Apple as their largest position. Icahn owns almost $6 billion of Apple. Piper Jaffrey recently put a $179 target price on Apple or a 51% return from its current share price.
Billionairesportfolio.com, run by two veterans of the hedge fund industry, helps self-directed investors invest alongside the world’s best billionaire investors.
At Billionairesportfolio.com we run an actively managed online portfolio of the “best ideas” from the world’s best billionaire investors and hedge funds. With that, we pay close attention anytime one of these great investors is making the case for one of their positions, particularly when feel confident enough to call it one of their best ideas. That’s precisely what we got a glimpse of these past two days at an annual fund raising event, the Robin Hood Investment Conference, hosted by billionaire hedge funder Paul Tudor Jones.
Here is a quick recap of their best ideas:
1) David Tepper- Billionaire David Tepper called the Chinese currency extremely overvalued. This view is in line with one he expressed in the past few weeks, arguing for the potential for China’s central bank to ease monetary policy more aggressively than most have thought. An aggressively easing PBOC and weakening of the yuan would be needed fuel for the sluggish Chinese economy, which would bode well for the outlook for Chinese stocks.
2) T. Boone Pickens – Self-made billionaire Boone Pickens told the Robin Hood audience to expect $70 oil by June of next year, which would be almost a double from oil’s price today. Pickens also said he liked the oil stock Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD). To trade Boone Pickens oil call you can buy the oil ETF (USO) or the oil and gas producers ETF (XOP).
3) Bill Ackman- Ackman reiterated his belief that Valeant (VRX) was extremely undervalued and that it should merge with Allergan (AGN) ,because Ackman does not believe the Allergan-Pfizer merger would be approved. Ackman also reiterated his view that Herbalife (HLF) was still a compelling short, with news from the DOJ to possibly come out today on nutritional supplements.
4) Larry Robbins – Billionaire Larry Robbins founder of the hedge fund Glenview Capital, pitched FMC, HCA and MON. Monsanto is Robbin’s second biggest position in his fund at almost $1.2 billion.
5) Dan Loeb – Billionaire Dan Loeb of Third Point said he thought Amgen (AMGN) and Allergan (AGN) should merge. Amgen is Loeb’s second biggest position in his hedge fund, at almost 13% or $1.4 billion.
6) John Paulson – Billionaire John Paulson’s top associate Samantha Greenberg pitched Charter Communications (CHTR). Greenberg said that Charter could be worth as much as $294 over the next year or almost a 60% return
from its share price today.
7) David Einhorn – Billionaire David Einhorn pitched Consol Energy (CNX). Einhorn first took a position in Consol at around $37 last year, today it sells for $7.80. That means if Consol just went back to the price Billionaire David Einhorn paid that would be more than a 350% return.
It’s a busy week for following the moves of the world’s richest and most influential investors. We have the Robin Hood Investors Conference in New York, which normally produces some investing nuggets from billionaire investors. And the deadline for their quarterly public disclosures to the SEC on their stock holdings is today (13f filings).
Remember, in the second quarter, the world was in the cross hairs of the calamity in Europe, surrounding the threat of a Greek default and exit from the euro. As Greece brought the world to the edge of disaster, the world’s biggest investors showed some fear, as they began shuffling their portfolios. While the turnover was much more subdued in the third quarter, there are a number of interesting buys and sells from the world’s top investors.
1) Billionaire hedge fund manager, David Tepper, who probably has the best 20 year track record of any investor alive, made quite a few interesting moves last quarter. Tepper slashed his holdings in large cap tech: Apple (AAPL) Google, (GOOG) and sold all of his Alibaba (BABA) stake. Tepper initiated new positions in Nike (NKE), Allstate (ALL) and Southwest Airlines (LUV).
2) Billionaire value investor Seth Klarman initiated a new 52 million share position in Alcoa, making him the second largest shareholder in this beaten down S&P 500 stock. Alcoa sells for just $8 a share but has a book value of almost $10. Alcoa is down almost 50% YTD, so Klarman is trying to pick a bottom in this aluminum stock.
3) Warren Buffett initiated a new positon in AT&T (T) and Kraft Heinz (KFC). Buffett now owns an incredible $22 billion of Kraft Heinz making his second largest position or 18% of his portfolio. Buffett also purchased more IBM (IBM) and trimmed his stakes in Goldman Sachs (GS) and Wal-Mart (WMT).
4) Billionaire hedge fund manager Dan Loeb of Third Point also took a new position in Kraft Heinz as well, almost $600 million. Loeb also took new stakes in Time Warner Cable (TWC) and Avago Technologies (AVGO). Loeb sold all of his SunEdison (SUNE) and Perrigo (PRGO) positions.
5) At the Robin Hood investment conference this morning, billionaire hedge fund manager, David Einhorn of Greenlight Capital said his “Best Idea” was Consol Energy (CNX), a coal and natural gas stock. The fund owns almost 23 million shares of Consol making it one its largest holdings. Einhorn first purchased the stock at $37.58 in late 2014, today it sells for $7.76. If Consol goes back to Einhorn’s purchase price it would mean a 350% return.
6) In an interview at the Robin Hood Investors Conference, Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JP Morgan, gave a rare glimpse into his billion dollar portfolio. Dimon said that he owns 3 stocks: Yum Brands (YUM), Boeing (BA) and Union Pacific (UNP).
7) Billionaire Leon Cooperman initiated a new almost $100 million stake in Valeant Pharmaceuticals (VRX) at prices between $155 and $260. Cooperman also initiated new stakes in Pfizer and Amazon. That reiterates our view that billionaire investors hedge funds continue to buy more healthcare and biotech stocks, even as the rest of the world is running from the sector.
Billionairesportfolio.com, run by two veterans of the hedge fund industry, helps self-directed investors invest alongside the world’s best billionaire investors.
Everyone has read news in the past about a big buyout in the stock market. And often the news will report that the stock in the company that is being acquired skyrocketed on the day. Envy tends to follow.
Generally, companies that are bought, are bought for a significant premium. Otherwise, shareholders would likely reject the offer. So when you hear of a big takeover, it’s not unusual to hear of a 20%,30%, even a 100% pop for shareholders on the day of the announcement.
So how to you identify the next big takeover? One of the easiest ways is to follow big, influential shareholders into stocks where they are pushing companies to sell themselves.
This week, we owned a stock in our Billionaire’s Portfolio, MedAssets (MDAS), that was taken over for a 33% premium. We held this stock for only two months, following the lead of one of our favorite activist investors, Starboard Value.
Starboard is one of the best at articulating recommendations for management and helping them execute on it. We followed Starboard Value into Office Depot and doubled our money. Starboard is run by the Wharton educated Jeff Smith, who is a tenacious and detailed activist investor. He has one of the best activist track records in the business. Since inception almost 13 years ago, Smith’s fund has made money on 82% of their activist campaigns (prior to MDAS). That’s one of the highest win rates in the industry.
Starboard took a huge activist stake in MedAssets in August and wrote a detailed letter to the company, outlining a plan to unlock value, which included strategic alternatives (such as the sale of the company).
Fast foward just two months: MedAssets was the second biggest winner in the entire stock market on Monday.
There has been a lot written about billionaire investing and activism over the past couple of years. It’s become a very hot topic. And the investors themselves, which once coveted anonymity, now utilize the spotlight to their advantage. Twitter, the internet and the media obsession with their wealth gives them the platform to spread their message about underperforming companies, and garner support from fellow shareholders. Still, finding the right investors to follow, and identifying the right opportunities is paramount.
Out of the 29 campaigns we’ve exited in our Billionaire’s Portfolio since the inception of our service, in August of 2012, five of the stocks were acquired.
That’s 17% of the stocks we’ve selected, and exited, that have been taken over for big premiums – so, strong anecdotal evidence that following influential shareholders that are pushing for a sale works!
Last week we heard from three top billionaire investors, publicly, and for different reasons. In all cases, they gave us some valuable nuggets.
On Friday, Bill Ackman held a conference call defending his multi-billion dollar position in Valeant. In the face of the scrutiny, he predicted Valeant shares would trade $448 in three years — a quadruple from recent prices.
Dan Loeb wrote released his quarterly investment letter last week describing his weak performance for the year and the challenging investment climate, yet expressing his high conviction for two stocks (a good read and good game plan outlined): Baxter International and Seven & i Holdings.
And billionaire David Tepper, who famously coined the Bernanke put and sparked a broad stock market rally back in 2010, said on Friday that he thinks China needs to ease more and faster, and that could set up for a situation where the Fed has to tighten quicker and more aggressively. He likes GM as way to lever the U.S. economy. He also said he has added to HCA Holdings.
Today, at the DealBook Conference, we heard from two other influential and legendary billionaire investors, Carl Icahn and Stanley Druckenmiller. Druckenmiller said he is short euros. He thinks the currency move underway will last for years, not months. He is long Amazon and is short “a bunch of value companies that buy back stock and need cyclical growth.” He used IBM as an example of one of those companies (owned by Warren Buffett).
Icahn weighed in on the controversial Valeant (sort of), implying he was involved but not saying whether it was from the long or short side. Rather than talk specifics on stocks, he dropped some interesting perspectives on investing and his success. He admitted he wasn’t a brilliant stock picker, nor does he think anyone is. He’s in the business of finding problems and fixing them. He has famously said he makes money “studying natural stupidity.” Today he added that he’s made so much money over his career because there are people running companies that are in over their heads and have bad incentives, he makes money holding these people accountable.
What about the weak spots in his portfolio? He says “activists get caught in cycles, you need staying power, ability to buy more when they drop.”
Full disclosure, at BillionairesPortfolio.com, our subscription-based premium online portfolio service, we own Transocean (RIG) and Freeport McMoran (FCX), piggybacking Stanley Druckenmiller and Carl Icahn’s investments.
The S&P 500 is now more than 200% higher than at its crisis-induced 2009 lows. Despite the powerful recovery in stocks, the rally has had few believers. All along the way, skeptics have pointed to threats in Europe, domestic debt issues, central bank meddling, political stalemates, perceived asset bubbles — you name it. As it relates to stocks, they’ve all been dead wrong.
The truth is, global central banks are in control. They have been coordinating since 2009 to save the worldwide economy from an apocalyptic spiral. Because the crisis was global, and the structural problems remain highly intertwined globally, the only hope toward achieving a return to sustainable growth was through a coordinated effort to restore stability and confidence. And with that backdrop, they had to create incentives for people to take risk again. It has worked! With the Fed moving closer to exiting emergency policies, this past year, the QE baton has been passed from the Fed to the ECB and the BOJ.
As part of the massive QE programs in Europe and Japan, the Bank of Japan has been outright buying stocks and the ECB might be next. After doubling the value of the Nikkei with his economic stimulus program, the architect of Abenomics, Prime Minister Abe, has said they are only “half way to its goals.” With the tail-winds of central bank influence to continue (Reason #1 to buy stocks). Here are three more simple reasons you should be buying, not selling, stocks:
1) History
If we applied the long-run annualized return for stocks (8%) to the pre-crisis highs of 1,576 on the S&P 500, we get 3,150 by the end of next year, when the Fed is expected to begin the slow process toward normalizing rates. That’s nearly 52% higher than current levels. Below you can see the table of the S&P 500, projecting this “normal” growth rate to stocks.
2) Valuation
In addition to the above, consider this: The P/E on next year’s S&P 500 earnings estimate is just 16.2, in line with the long-term average (16). But we are not just in a low-interest-rate environment, we are in the mother of all low-interest-rate environments (ZERO). With that, when the 10-year yield runs on the low side, historically, the P/E on the S&P 500 runs closer to 20, if not north of it. If we multiply next year’s consensus earnings estimate for the S&P 500 of $126.77 by 20 (where stocks to be valued in low rate environments), we get 2,535 for the S&P 500 by next year — 23% higher.
3) Recession Risk
For those who argue the economy is fragile, the bond market disagrees with you. The yield curve may be the best predictor of recessions historically. Yield curve inversions (where short rates move above longer-term rates) have preceded each of the last seven recessions. Based on this analysis, the below chart from the Cleveland Fed shows the current recession risk at 3.66% — virtually nil.
What about the impact on stocks of a rate hiking cycle? Historically, through the past six rate hiking cycles stocks have performed well, contrary to popular belief. Still, there is an important distinction this time: The Fed moving away from emergency policies is a celebratory event for stocks and the economy. After nine years of crisis, and a near global apocalypse, the Fed thinks the economy is robust enough take down the “high alert” flag.
Billionairesportfolio.com, run by two veterans of the hedge fund industry, helps self-directed investors invest alongside the world’s best billionaire investors.
This morning, the European Central Bank primed global stocks by telegraphing more action (more stimulus) to respond to the recent shake up in global economic activity and sentiment.
It had to happen. In the grand scheme of things, the ECB’s sentiment manipulation this morning was the bare minimum of what had to be done.
The global central banks (led by the Fed) have spent, committed and promised trillions of dollars to manufacture the tepid recovery that’s underway, in hopes that they can bridge their way to the point where economies begin to organically grow again. That bridge has not yet reached the point of organic growth. And it’s not even that close. With that said, the recent collapse in oil prices, and the threat to an implosion of the energy sector was getting narrowly close to undoing what the central banks have done to this point. And, not only is another downturn unpalatable, but it’s apocalyptic. The bullets have all been fired. Fiscal and monetary policy would have no shot to ward off another global destabilization.
The plan for the continuation of the global central bank-led (and manufactured) economic recovery has been clear. And the evolution, where the U.S. economy began leading global growth, while Europe and Japan were just embarking on big and bold stimulus is likely the reason Bernanke felt comfortable enough to exit. Think about it, the Fed hands off of the QE baton to the ECB (Europe) and the BOJ (Japan). Meanwhile, the Fed can make the first step in moving away from emergency policies. Europe and Japan have all of the ingredients to execute on their big QE promises to continue providing fuel for global growth and stability (they need a weaker currency).
The Fed’s exit from emergency policies shows their confidence in the economic recovery. And the ECB and BOJ can “print away”, suppressing global market interest rates (which helps the Fed), fueling higher global stock prices (which helps everyone), and fueling capital flows into the U.S. to further bolster U.S. recovery.
The question is often asked, when referring to QE, “what is the transmission mechanism?”
Here’s the answer: 1) Stability – QE assures people that the central bank(s) are there, acting, and ready to do more, if needed, to defend against any further shocks to the global economy and financial system. That creates stability. And with that stability backdrop, major central banks promote incentives for people to borrow again, to spend again, to hire again. 2) Risk-Taking – Ultra-low interest rates and a stable environment promotes the rebirth of housing activity, and encourages investors to reach further out on the risk curve for more return. That means more demand for stocks, and higher stock prices. Higher stocks and higher housing prices create paper wealth. Paper wealth gives people comfort to borrow again, to spend again and to hire again.
That has been the recipe. And it has worked! The key ingredients continue to be higher stocks and higher housing prices (even if at a modest growth rate).
Central Banks Need You To Buy Stocks
With the ECB doubling down on their commitment to do “whatever it takes” and with the architect of the massive
QE program in Japan, Prime Minister Abe, uttering those same words in the past month, the pressure valve on the Fed has been released and should clear the path for the Fed to make its first move on interest rates in nine years this coming December.
When we consider where we’ve been (fighting back from what was potentially the Great Apocalypse of economic crises), and how the economy is performing now, the fact that the Fed thinks the economy is robust enough to remove emergency policies is, indeed, a time for celebration.
And with that, there are plenty of reasons to buy stocks, not just because central banks need you to. But frankly, most people don’t seem to understand this central bank dynamic anyway. And that’s precisely why sentiment has been gloomy on stocks for the entire recovery, dating back to the 2009 bottom.
Given this negative sentiment, with respect to the economic outlook and the outlook for stocks, it’s not surprising that the declines in stocks along the way have been sharper and more slippery because of this pervasive fear in the investment community. Along the way that has created great buying opportunities. This recent decline is no different. Often market sentiment tends to over emphasize events. And it tends to be wrong (contrarian). Nonetheless, when events pass, as we’ve seen along the way, regardless of the outcome, the fog lifts, and the underlying fundamentals return to dictate performance.
From a valuation standpoint, when rates are “low,” historically, the P/E ratio of the stock market tends to run north of 20. And, of course, we are not just in a low interest rate environment; we are in the mother of all low interest rate environments, even with the Fed ready to begin moving. North of 20 is precisely where the valuation on stocks has gone in the past year. Now, based on next year’s earnings estimate, the market is valued at just 15x. A move to 20x earnings would mean an S&P 500 around 2,600 by next year. That’s 30% higher than current levels.
Why would a low rate environment tend to mean higher valuations for stocks?
Economics are about incentives, and when rates are ultra-low, people are incentivized to switch out of bonds and into stocks, to seek higher yield/higher returns. When we think about the direct implications of this incentive dynamic, we look no further than the amount of cash that big funds are holding, and where that might find a home.
Historically, one of the most predictive indicators of stock market bottoms is how much cash fund managers are holding. Right now, cash is at levels only seen during the 2008-2009 Great Recession period. Fund managers are holding 5.5% of their portfolio in cash and their allocation to stocks are at the lowest levels since 2012. Furthermore, 35% of all funds are now overweight cash.
When you see fund managers so pessimistic on stocks, while holding so much cash, it has historically been a signal for a huge move in stocks. These managers are paid to invest, and cash has always been the dry powder that’s fueled every rally in stocks throughout history. When fund managers are not holding cash and are fully invested, they have no powder left to buy stocks. The only way they can buy a stock is to sell another stock, which usually occurs at market tops.
The last two times fund managers held this much cash while being so underweight stocks was 2009 and 2012.
What happened? A huge rally! Between 2009 and 2011, the S&P rose 41%. Between 2012 and 2014, the S&P 500 rose 46%.
Sign up for our Free ebook, The Little Black Book of Billionaire Secrets, and learn how to follow the “best ideas” of the world’s top billionaire investors. You don’t have to be rich to take part. You don’t have to pay the hefty 2% management fee and 20% profit share to a hedge fund. You can follow the lead of powerful billionaire investors by simply buying the same stocks they do, in your own brokerage account.
Last week the Wall Street Journal published a report on 70 activist campaigns, looking back over the past six years. No surprise, in evaluating these campaigns, they found that activism works.
With the ability to buy controlling stakes in public companies, we know that activist investors can influence outcomes in the stocks they buy. They have the unique privilege of controlling their own destiny. With that edge, these investors have proven to produce a significant return over what the broader market gives you over time, on average.
When we follow these activist investors into stocks, piggybacking their moves, not only do we get to participate in their performance, for free, but we get an investor on our side that has a lot of money on the line (both their investor’s money and often a lot of their personal money). With that, we get to follow the lead of someone with power and influence, and with every incentive to see the campaign succeed.
Given their record of success, when an activist investor takes a position in a stock and publicly gives a price target for the stock, we take note.
In each of the five stocks listed below, a billionaire investor or hedge fund is calling for a double:
1) Macy’s (NYSE:M) – Starboard Value, a top $4 billion activist hedge fund, said at the Ira Sohn Hedge Fund Conference that Macy’s could be worth $125 a share if the company would sell or spin off its real estate. The stock today sells for $50.36. If Starboard is right, the stock has a 172% potential return.
2) NCR (NYSE:NCR) – Marcato Capital, a $3 billion activist hedge fund run by Bill Ackman’s protégé, Mick McGuire, said that NCR could be worth as much as $51 to $59 a share. The stock is $25 today. If McGuire is right, NCR has a double in it (or more).
3) Bob Evans (NASDAQ:BOBE) – Sandell Asset Management, a top billion dollar plus activist hedge fund, said that Bob Evans could be worth as much as $90 a share if it sold or spun off its real estate. Bob Evans sells for $44 a share. A move to $90 would be a 105% return.
4) Yum Brands (NYSE:YUM) – Carl Icahn protégé, Keith Meister, who runs the $8 billion activist hedge fund Corvex Management, said at Ira Sohn this year that YUM could be worth as much as $130 a share, if the company spun off its Chinese operations. With the stock selling at $70 that is an 86% potential return.
5) Brookdale Senior Living (NYSE:BKD) – Billionaire Larry Robbins of the $15 billion hedge fund Glenview Capital Management has said that Brookdale could double, as the company’s real estate was worth as much as its share price. That is when the stock was trading at $30. Today Brookdale sells for $22.87 which would imply a 161% potential return.
Sign up for our Free ebook, The Little Black Book of Billionaire Secrets, and learn how to follow the “best ideas” of the world’s top billionaire investors. You don’t have to be rich to take part. You don’t have to pay the hefty 2% management fee and 20% profit share to a hedge fund. You can follow the lead of powerful billionaire investors by simply buying the same stocks they do, in your own brokerage account.
If we look back at some of the great investors of our time, for many of them you can attribute timing to their success. For example, if Warren Buffett and Carl Icahn started their careers in a different era, they would not have likely achieved the same level of success they have in investing. Warren Buffett has said it himself.
Of course, given the right time and the right place, you still have to act, have skill, take smart risk and be good at what you do.
Though rare, we have these “right times and right places” throughout history. And I think we are standing right in the middle of one, right now.
First, if we think about the long term performance, opportunities and risks of the U.S. Stock market, first we should acknowledge that the U.S. stock market is unmatched. It represents the largest, most sophisticated capital markets in the world, in the largest and leading economy in the world, one with advanced corporate governance, investor protections and fueled by a relationship with the economy that is self-reinforcing.
Now, let’s consider that stocks over the past 15 years have produced just 3.8% annualized returns for investors, an extreme weak level compared to historical rolling 15-year periods (see chart below). That’s an even weaker 15-year period than that of the bear market that ended in 1974. With that, the next 15-years are likely well above average returns for stocks. You can see in this chart from Barron’s below, the rolling 15-year periods that followed that ’74 bear market were in the mid to high teens, roughly doubling the long-term average return of the S&P 500. This argues for very good times for stocks in the years ahead.
Additionally, there are a slew of fundamental reasons that support this scenario. To name a few, U.S. stocks have global capital flows working in their favor. The Fed is on a path to remove emergency policies (rates higher), the ECB and BOJ continue to be well entrenched in aggressive QE programs (rates lower). That creates weaker currencies in QE countries, which creates capital exit, and the best home for that capital is the U.S. — an economy performing better on a relative basis, and with prospects for rising rates (a primary driver of currency appreciation and capital flows). Add to that, given the record low base rates will be moving from, there is no incentive to put capital into bond markets — the bond market alternative is stocks (winner stocks).
From a historical perspective, the record cash levels sitting in the coffers of institutional money managers argue for much higher stocks to come, as that cash gets put to work. The go-to valuation metric for Wall Street, P/E, is very low on next year’s earnings, especially when you consider what valuation tends to look like in historically low interest rate environments. In those cases, it tends to trade north of 20. Of course, we are in the mother of all low interest rates environment (ZERO). The P/E on next year’s earnings is now 15.1. That’s on earnings estimates of $127.62. If we multiply next year’s earnings estimate of $127.62 by 20 (where stocks tend to be valued in low rate environments), we get 2,552 for the S&P 500 by next year – almost 30% higher than current levels. We did this analysis last year and early this year, when P/E was closer to 17 and sure enough, given low rates, and given weak alternatives, stock valuations gravitated toward and above 20x on trailing 12 month earnings.
Add to this that we are at 15-year lows in market sentiment (a contrarian indicator). So we digest all of this within the framework of an environment where the central banks continue to promote growth, and respond to any shocks that can knock the global economic recovery off path.
With that, remember back in the middle of 2012, when Europe was on the brink of collapse and global markets were quaking because of the potential of European debt defaults and a break-up of the euro. The head of the European Central Bank, Mario Draghi, stepped in, and in a prepared speech said that they will do “whatever it takes” to preserve the euro. That comment turned the sentiment tide, not only for Europe, but for global markets that day. If you bought German stocks on that comment, you never saw a day in the red – the DAX rose 20% by the end of the year and has risen at a 45 degree angle ever since, nearly doubling those “pre-comment” levels earlier this year.
Same can be said for U.S. Stocks. If you woke up and bought stocks on the back of the Draghi comment, you never saw a down day and enjoyed as much as a 60% run since.
Throughout the entire global economic crisis, there has been no better example of the impact of sentiment on markets and the global economic outlook, and no better example of how that sentiment can successfully be managed.
With this in mind, there was a very symbolic stand made last week by the very important figure heads of the developed world, all standing in front of podiums and speaking. We’ve seen Yellen attempting to temper the uncertainty about the Fed rate path and their view on the economy. Japan’s Prime Minister Abe (the orchestrator of Japan’s big stimulus policies) spoke in NY on Tuesday of last week and said some very magic words … he vowed that he and the BOJ would do “whatever it takes” to return Japan to robust sustainable growth. And this past Thursday night, the head of the ECB, Mario Draghi, also spoke in the U.S. He emphasized the importance of the return to health of the European economy, saying “it’s in our interest, in your interest, and that of everybody, everywhere.” And he said “we will not rest until our monetary union is complete.” So we have the two major central banks/administrations that have taken the QE torch from the Fed, standing up and telling us that they will continue to do what it takes to fuel growth and promote stability. To top it off, Bernanke, the ex-Fed Chairman and architect of the global economic recovery, did a one hour interview this morning to kick off the new week on CNBC, has done an Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal and is scheduled to do Bloomberg tomorrow. Under the guise of a book promotion, he has spoken very candidly about current monetary policy, something ex-Fed heads don’t typically do, as it can draw attention away from the current Fed and potentially muddy and already muddied picture. Clearly, global policymakers are stepping up communications, which is key in curbing fear and uncertainty — and the ex-Fed Chair seems to be part of it.
Looking back, we could see this simple coordinated PR campaign to be enough to turn the tide of sentiment. And from there, the fundamentals take over.
When we consider this “rare opportunity” where we are in the right place at the right time, what comes to mind is the meteoric rise of billionaire Bill Ackman, and how he took advantage of the financial crisis to kick off one of the best 10-year runs of any investor in the world.
Back in late 2008, at the depths of the global economic crisis, Bill Ackman, one of the great billionaire investors we follow, stepped in and bought 25% of one of the largest real estate companies in the country. It was General Growth Properties (GGP). The stock was trading between 25 and 50 cents. And it was teetering on the brink of bankruptcy.
So why was the company nearing bankruptcy, and why would Ackman step in and buy it?
Well, as with many companies at that time, in a literal credit freeze, the company was in need of money. Their access to liquidity had been cut off. This was a risk that companies as large as Wal-Mart were facing at the time. From an investor’s standpoint, one that has cash and access to cash, this represented an opportunity. The company had more assets than liabilities. The company was well run. The core business was solid. They needed liquidity. If they don’t get money, they go bankrupt and fire sale assets. Stockholders get wiped out. Debt holders get pennies on the dollar from the fire sale. If they do get capital, not only do they have a very good chance of surviving, but they have the opportunity to dominate coming out of the economic crisis, as their competition (those not as well run and those that can’t access capital) get decimated. That means, a bigger market opportunity. With that, Ackman rode the stock through bankruptcy, helped convince debt holders of the opportunity and helped negotiate a debt restructuring and helped fund and raise the needed liquidity. Not only did shareholders remain in tact, out of bankruptcy, but all stakeholders made a killing.
Ackman sold General Growth Properties in late 2013, early 2014, turning his initial $60 million investment into $1.6 billion. That’s an eye-popping return, but when you look through the history of the portfolios of the billionaires we follow, it’s common to see the presence of huge winners. Take Icahn and Netflix: As we know, there is no better investor in the world than Icahn, but his performance of the past few years has been highly attributed to one huge winner: Netflix. He turned roughly $300 million into nearly $2 billion in three years.
This demonstrates the importance of taking good, calculated risks, spread across enough opportunities, and in situations that can be influenced by a big investor.
With energy and commodity stocks selling at 20-year lows, many at all-time lows, I think we will see another General Growth Properties in this environment – one of those right place/right time opportunities to make 10X, 20X or 50X on your money. The great thing is, we know how to spot these huge winners like GGP by following the best billionaire investors and activists into deeply distressed stocks, where they can influence the fundamentals, and where the potential upside is unlimited and the downside is limited. A number of billionaires have been bottom picking energy stocks in recent months, including legendary investors Carl Icahn, George Soros and Stanley Druckenmiller.
We currently hold a stock in our Billionaire’s Portfolio that represents one of these “right place/right time” opportunities. And it has all of the trappings to be the next billionaire-maker. Consider this: There is a pioneer activist investor that has 100% of his fund in this stock, he controls 100% of the board, he has his hand-picked CEO running the company, and he has a price target on the stock that is 1800% higher than current prices. Join our Billionaire’s Portfolio service now and we will send you all of the details on this high potential activist-owned stock immediately.
