The Bond Markets Is Sending A Signal: Manipulation

March 14, 5:00 pm EST

Wall Street has a lot of adages that many follow, and few question (but they should).

One of them:  The bond market is smarter than the stock market.

The logic is that bond market investors are better and quicker at interpreting news and information than stock investors.  As such, the belief is that bonds will be pricing in the more probable outcome before stocks.

So, is there a signal to be taken from the behavior of the 10-year yield?  While stocks have fully recovered the losses of December, you might expect the bond market to reflect the ease in uncertainty (i.e. moving back higher, along with stocks).  But bond yields are back near the lows of early last year, and appear to be pricing OUT some (and threatening to price out all) of the optimism that followed the Trump election.

 

With that, at 2.60% on the U.S. 10-year government bond yield (a global benchmark interest rate), is there an element of worst-case scenario for the global economy being priced in?  I’d say with the U.S. economy growing at 3%, and stocks at these levels, even when the 10-year was at 3.25%, bonds were (to some degree) pricing the worst-case scenario.

So, why are bond yields as low as 2.60%?  Smarter market participants?  No.  It’s intervention/manipulation.  Sure, the Fed has put the brakes on its policy direction.  The ECB has reversed course on policy!  China is easing.  But, most importantly, the Bank of Japan is still executing on an unlimited QE campaign.

The Bank of Japan’s yield targeting policy gives it the license to buy unlimited assets.  They have been and will continue to buy U.S. government bonds, and they continue to be the anchor for global interest rates.  And it’s safe to say, they are acting with plenty of coordination with the other major central banks in the world (namely, the Fed).

Bottom line:  The interest rate picture is signaling one very clear action.  The Bank of Japan is still engaging in full throttle QE. 

Join me here to get my curated portfolio of 20 stocks that I think can do multiples of what broader stocks do, coming out of this market correction environment.
Why Global Markets Haven’t Been Troubled By Brexit

March 13, 5:00 pm EST

We haven’t talked much about the Brexit drama.

Why?  Because it has been noisy, yet unlikely to create any shock-waves through the global economy.

Even the knee-jerk reaction to the Brexit vote in 2016, didn’t have staying power.  The uncertainty that was quickly manifested in global stocks, was just as quickly reversed.  You can see it in the S&P chart below …

 

Why the sharp reversal?  And why isn’t Brexit a big shock risk?

We had seen a similar movie before: Grexit.  Greece’s EU and EMU partners talked tough about a “my way or the highway” bailout plan, which included harsh austerity. But when push came to shove, the Greek’s stood their ground, resisted the harsh austerity measures that came with the bailout, and it quickly became clear that Europe had more to lose, than did Greece, by the Greeks leaving the EU and (most importantly) leaving the euro. The Greek’s had negotiating leverage.  And they got concessions.
In the case of Brexit, the EU partners started with tough talk too, promising a dark and ugly future for the UK.  But the EU had/has plenty of risk (i.e. others following the lead of Britain … ex. Italy, Spain).  Clearly they both need each other to thrive.  The UK loses if the EU implodes.  The EU loses if the UK implodes.

The populist movement that gave us Grexit, gave us Brexit and then the Trump election, and recently a new government in Italy with an “Italy first” agenda.  It’s a movement of reform.  And reform is now becoming the norm, not the extreme. We’re hoping to see reform in China now too.

Join me here to get my curated portfolio of 20 stocks that I think can do multiples of what broader stocks do, coming out of this market correction environment.
Why The Fed Cares (A Lot) About Oil Prices

March 12, 5:00 pm EST

Remember, when oil prices began the fourth-quarter plunge from $76 down to as low as $42, we talked about the damage it would do to the inflation outlook, and how it may provoke a response from the Fed, which it has.

With today’s inflation data, you can see the impact of (yet another) oil price crash.  Headline inflation in the U.S. was running near 3% late last summer, the highest level since 2012. Now it’s 1.5%.

 

The Fed likes to talk about their assessment of inflation, excluding the effects of volatile oil prices. But they have a record of acting on monetary policy when oil is moving, especially in this post-crisis environment where deflation has been a persistent threat throughout.  They acted in 2016.  And they’ve acted in 2019.

Why?  They have the tools to deal with inflation.  They raise rates.  But the tools are limited to deal with deflation.  They cut rates.  But when rates hit zero, they have to get creative (like QE, negative rates, etc.).  And the consequences of losing the deflation battle are big.  When people hold onto their money thinking things will be cheaper tomorrow than they are today, that mindset can bring the economy to a dead halt. It’s a formula that can become irreversible.

So, we can see why the Fed has been pro-active in response to falling oil prices, falling stocks and falling inflation.  It can all lead to falling confidence.  And that can put them in the position of fighting the dangerous spiral of deflation.

That said, oil is on the rebound.  And as we discussed last month (here), with the quieting of controversy surrounding the Saudi government, it looks like a V-shaped recovery could be in store for oil prices (as we’ve seen with stocks).

Join me here to get my curated portfolio of 20 stocks that I think can do multiples of what broader stocks do, coming out of this market correction environment.
The Fed’s ’60 Minutes’ Strategy

March 11, 5:00 pm EST

We ended last week with a 4.4% plunge in Chinese stocks.  What followed, Friday morning (EST time), was an announcement that the Fed Chair (Jerome Powell) would be appearing on an exclusive 60 Minutes sit down interview Sunday night.

This is a rare occurrence, that the Fed Chair does a mainstream media interview/Q&A.  These Q&A’s are typically done in Congressional hearings, following Fed meetings or at select economic conferences.  The common theme:  He speaks economics and policy to economic and policy practitioners.

With that, this interview with 60 Minutes was clearly a desire to speak to the broader public.  In part, it was a response to the growing risks of a confidence shock (given the December stock market decline, Brexit drama and China/U.S. trade uncertainty).  It was an opportunity to tell the public that the economy is doing well, despite the media’s doom and gloom stories.

Also, in part, it was an opportunity to tell the public that the Fed is there to defend against shocks and panics, and that they won’t be swayed by politics.

Powell was also specifically asked about a few of the cherry picked data points the financial media has been parading around in recent days.  As we discussed Friday, without context, some of the data can sound ominous.  He added context, including for the  dip in retail sales from December.  Of course the retail sales hit was the result in the knee-jerk swing in confidence that comes with the December plunge in the stock market.  He said they would be watching the January number closely.  The January number today, indeed, was strong.

That (the interview and the confirmation of the retail sales data) was a catalyst for a big bounceback in stocks today.

Powell is following the script of the Ben Bernanke.  When Bernanke was directing the Fed through the storm of the financial crisis, he (and the Fed) were being killed in the media.  And the media set the tone for global leaders to take shots at the Fed too.  So, Bernanke took to 60 minutes to speak directly to the people – to set the record straight.  That interview set the bottom in the stock market — and it turned the tide in global sentiment.

Join me here to get my curated portfolio of 20 stocks that I think can do multiples of what broader stocks do, coming out of this market correction environment.
Misleading Headline Of The Day: Worst start to the year for equity flows since 2008

March 8, 5:00 pm EST

Overnight, China reported a 20% plunge in its February exports.  That was the driver for a big down day for Chinese stocks — down 4.4%.  For context, this comes after a 27% run UP in the Chinese stock market since January 4th.

The export plunge was the worst reading since February of 2016.  What was happening in February of 2016?  Global stocks put in a bottom in February of 2016, after a quick and ugly 14% correction.  And the bottom was set by some central bank intervention (first the BOJ in the currency markets, then China stoking bank lending, then the Fed and the ECB followed with stimulative policies).  This time around, we are coming out of a deep slide in global stocks too, and we’ve had a similar formula of central bank support to fuel the recovery.

If anything, this Chinese export plunge is even more reason to believe that China has to make a deal, soon (i.e. a deal is getting closer).  Trump and Larry Kudlow (National Economic Advisor) both used the opportunity this morning to make that point.

Still, as I said yesterday, when stocks go down, the media is quick to revive the doom and gloom narrative.

For example, Reuters ran a story today citing some research from Bank of America.  Here’s the headline:  Worst start to the year for equity flows since 2008.

That sounds scary – the 2008 reference.  Let’s take a closer look.

Bank of America says $60 billion has been “yanked” out of equities since the start of the year.  That’s a big number, until you add some context.

Let’s take a look at this historical chart of the total market capitalization of listed domestic companies in the U.S.

 

The size of the U.S. stock market was just shy of $20 trillion going into the financial crisis back in 2007.  Today it’s worth $32 trillion. So the stock market is more than 50% bigger, which on a relative basis, makes the amount of money that has moved OUT of stocks this year closer to half as large as the retreat in 2007-2008.

While we are on the topic of shocking headlines, another major financial news company ran this headline and touted it on their TV coverage:  U.S. households see biggest decline in net worth since the financial crisis.

There was a drop of $3.73 trillion in the fourth quarter, compared to the third quarter.  Another scary headline.

But as you can see, household net worth is up almost $40 trillion since the pre-financial crisis peak or 58% bigger.  That makes a $3.7 trillion contraction a small blip on the chart.  And, of course, the driver of the losses was solely a stock market rout in December (which has now been largely recovered).

Join me here to get my curated portfolio of 20 stocks that I think can do multiples of what broader stocks do, coming out of this market correction environment.
The Script For Stocks Continues To Look Like Another 2016

March 7, 5:00 pm EST

Stocks continue to back off after completing a full recovery of the December declines.

Here’s another look at the chart we observed on Monday, where you can see the big technical area of resistance (three prior highs) — and today we close back on the 200-day moving average (the purple line).

As we discussed on Monday, the failure of this level shouldn’t be too surprising, as a reasonable technical area to take some profits.

As stocks slide back, the media is quick to turn the attention back toward fears of global economic slowdown.  What’s the big difference between now and December?  The Fed has moved from telegraphing rate hikes to ‘neutral’ and sitting/watching.  The PBOC (central bank in China) has done more to stimulate their economy (to incentivize bank lending) and this morning, the ECB has come in with more easy money policies.  Both the Fed and ECB were pre-emptive shots.

Like 2016, the response from central banks has been aggressive and coordinated to ward off slowdown and/or a stock market destabilization.  That recipe worked well in 2016.  I suspect it will work well this year.

Join me here to get my curated portfolio of 20 stocks that I think can do multiples of what broader stocks do, coming out of this market correction environment.
Silicon Valley Is About To Dump Overvalued IPOs On The Investing Public

March 6, 5:00 pm EST

Yesterday we talked about the big IPO agenda for the year.

We have some big Silicon Valley “disrupters” set to go public this year, including Lyft, Uber, WeWork and Airbnb.

Remember, these companies emerged from a post-Great Recession world, where pension funds and sovereign wealth funds were flooding money into Silicon Valley, following the money and regulatory favor from the U.S. government.  Of the $800 billion fiscal stimulus response to the financial crisis, the Obama administration doled out $100 billion worth of funding and grants for “the discovery, development and implementation of various technologies.”  The money followed it, and the private market valuations soared.

Were they based on reality or hype and too much money chasing the dream of the next Facebook?

Let’s take a look today at how the big “disrupters” of the past two years have fared, after much anticipated IPOs.

Dropbox:  Dropbox was priced at $21 per share.  It started trading at over $28.  Today it trades at $22.

Spotify:  Priced at $165.90 per share.  It started trading at $164.  It currently trades at $146.

Snap: Priced at $17 per share.  It started trading at $22.  Today it trades at $9.90.

Nothing good for the average investor that picked up these shares when these stocks went public.

Who has gotten rich? The founders.

The founder of Dropbox is worth $2.3 billion.  His company lost half a billion dollars last year on $1.4 billion in revenue.  Revenue growth is slowing to a near mortal 25% growth rate – and losses are widening dramatically.

Spotify’s founder is now also worth about $2.3 billion.  Revenue growth is slowing too to unexciting levels, and the company is still losing money.

What about Snap?  The Snap founder is worth over $2 billion.  Snap lost $1.2 billion last year, on $1.1 billion in revenue. Revenue growth has gone from 600%, to 100%, to 43% last year.

The hyper-growth valuations are unlikely to get hyper-growth.  I suspect we might see the same with the roster of IPOs this year.

Join me here to get my curated portfolio of 20 stocks that I think can do multiples of what broader stocks do, coming out of this market correction environment.
Tech IPOs May Be Coming Late To The Party

March 5, 5:00 pm EST

There’s a lot of excitement about the building IPO docket for the year.  Let’s take a look of the lay of the land …

There is said to be more than 220 companies planning to go public in 2019.

On Friday, Lyft filed an S1 with the SEC (a prospectus like document) in preparation for an IPO.  This will be the first Silicon Valley darling to go public this year.

Lyft is the second largest ride-sharing company — owns about a third of the U.S. market, with Uber owning the rest.  Uber is expected to go public this year.  The other big ones coming:  Airbnb, WeWork and Palantir.

We’ve clearly had a boom cycle in Silicon Valley over the past decade.  But are these IPOs coming late the party?

Remember, we have an administration in Washington that has tightened the regulatory screws on the dominant publicly-traded tech giants (Facebook, Amazon, Google).  The regulatory tailwinds (or lack thereof) that they enjoyed along the path of their disruptive growth, have now turned into headwinds.  And the stocks have all been hit, as a result.

Keep in mind, the private market valuations were pumped-up in these IPO candidates when public equity markets were offering little optimism about future returns.  With that, pension money was flowing into the coffers of Silicon Valley private equity firms.  And private equity fund managers were throwing money at things — and companies have been burning through that money, ramping staff, buying fancy offices and inundating us with blitz advertising campaigns.

Safe to say there has been an overhyping of the term “disrupters.”  In many cases, we’re looking at startups trying to underprice and outspend (with our pension money) in a traditional business, without having the hurdle of making money (maybe ever).  Not surprisingly, there have been market share wins.

But public companies tend to be held to a standard: profitability.  We’ll see how they do with the shifting market environment (i.e. late cycle Silicon Valley).

Lyft will be an early indicator.  Its last private investment valued the company at $15.1 billion.  For that, in their filing, they revealed a company doing a little over $2 billion in revenue, while losing almost a billion dollars last year.  Revenue growth has been slowing, losses have been widening as the private equity investors attempt to cash out in the public markets.

Join me here to get my curated portfolio of 20 stocks that I think can do multiples of what broader stocks do, coming out of this market correction environment.
Stocks Bumping Into Technical Profit Taking Levels

March 4, 5:00 pm EST

Stocks sold off sharply this morning, before bouncing nicely from the lows.   The range on the day was the third largest of the year.

The question:  Was the selling today technically-driven or was there a catalyst that introduced new risk into the market (i.e. something bigger)?

Let’s take a look at the chart …

With this sharp V-shaped recovery of the past two months, we have stocks testing these highs, and failing today.

But the failure of this level (for the moment) shouldn’t be too surprising.  Following a runup of 20%, for some this is a reasonable technical area to sell some/ to take profit.

But is there more to the sell-off this morning?

We did get an announcement that the Congressional Judiciary Committee has launched an investigation into the Trump administration.  It includes document requests from 80 people/entities tied to the administration.  They will be looking at obstruction of justice, public corruption and abuse of power (the latter of which, might be the most subjective and, therefore, threatening).

After all of the allegations and political mudslinging surrounding Trump, could this pose the biggest risk to the Trump administration and policymaking yet?  Possibly.

Congress has a unchallengeable investigatory and subpoena power.  They can dig as deeply and broadly as the want, and create as much havoc as they want, which means this may dominate what happens on Capitol Hill until the 2020 election.

Now, with all of this said, if we look at the market reaction today, as a proxy for how the market is digesting this — we did not see across the board selling.  That’s good.  If we look inside the U.S. stock market, most active stocks were a mix of up and down on the day (including up days Apple, Facebook, Baba and Amazon).  That’s good.  And foreign stocks were less impacted by the early swing in U.S. stocks.  That’s good. The emerging market futures index MXEF actually finished at the New York close UP from Friday’s close.

Join me here to get my curated portfolio of 20 stocks that I think can do multiples of what broader stocks do, coming out of this market correction environment.
Key Charts Heading Into The Weekend: Stocks, Rates and China

March 1, 5:00 pm EST

As we end the week, let’s take a look at some key charts …

We finish the week with stocks trading at 16.5 times the Wall Street estimate on 2019 earnings.

That’s cheap in an economy running at 3.1% growth (for full 2018) and with the with the 10-year yield back well below 3%.

Here’s a look at yields …

As you can see, this important line continues to hold in yields, from the run-up following the optimism surrounding Trumponomics.

And here’s a look at stocks …

The important trend in stocks that held in December is from the global financial crisis-induced lows of 2009. This describes the global economic recovery.  A break of this trend would have spelled trouble.  But as we know, policymakers have reminded us that they will still, even 10-years following the crisis, do whatever it takes to keep the recovery going (and stocks are an important driver).  With that, we have another nice “V” on this 10-year uptrend.

Next, we’ve talked about the Chinese stock market as a key clue in measuring China’s willingness to make the necessary concessions to get a trade deal done. 

We finish the week on the highs, now up 23% from the lows of January.

And here’s a look at the other key proxy on U.S./China trade … the Chinese currency.
In the chart above, the falling line represents a strengthening yuan versus the U.S. dollar.

China’s currency manipulation (i.e. weak currency policy) is at the core of the global trade imbalances that precipitated the global financial crisis.  With that, the currency is a key piece of the trade and structural reform demands from the Trump administration.

You can see how China has been maneuvering to pacify currency tensions over time:
1) They slowly allowed the currency to climb (against the dollar) following threats of a big tariff on China from Graham and Schumer (yes, Schumer) back in 2005.
2) When the global economic crisis hit, they went back to a peg to protect their ability to export.
3) They went back to a slow crawl higher as tensions rose, and people began to believe the developed market economies might be passing the torch to China for economic leadership.
4) It became clear that China can’t grow fast enough in a world where developed market economies are struggling. So, they went back to weakening the currency to protect their ability to export.
5) They strengthened the yuan when Trump was elected to try to ward off a trade war.
6) Trump wasn’t placated and tariffs were launched. They weakened the currency with the idea that a threat of a big one-off devaluation in the currency might create some leverage.
7)  After trying to hold-out, it has become clear that they need to get a deal done, as the economy continues to sink.  They’ve been walking the currency higher again – a signal, along with stocks, that they are willing to make aggressive concessions to get a deal done.

Join me here to get my curated portfolio of 20 stocks that I think can do multiples of what broader stocks do, coming out of this market correction environment.