July 15,  5:00 pm EST

Second quarter earnings kick into gear this week.  It starts with the banks.  Today we heard from the third largest bank in the country: Citigroup.

Let’s look at some key takeaways.

First, in Q1, the expectations were set for just 2% year-over-year earnings growth from the big banks.  Instead, we had positive earnings surprises in each (Citi, Wells, JPM and Bank of America), for an average earnings growth of 11%.  So, we had double-digit earnings growth for the biggest banks in the country.

Now we’re looking at Q2.  While the bar has been set low again for the broader market (looking for an earnings contraction by 3% compared the same period a year ago), the view on the banks is much more positive for Q2.  Wall Street is looking for 12% earnings growth in Q2 from the big banks (on average).
Citi got it started this morning with good numbers – and positives surprises.
There was a significant bump in earnings due to Citi’s interest in a trading technology business that IPO’d last quarter. But if we strip that out, they still beat.  Most importantly, on that adjusted EPS (stripping out the gains from the IPO interest) they grew earnings by 12% year-over-year.  That follows 11% yoy growth in Q1.  Remember, this yoy comparison is against a very strong base — we had better than 20% yoy growth last year for the S&P 500 last year.  So, the banks are putting up good numbers.

We’ll hear from JP Morgan and Wells Fargo tomorrow.  And Bank of America will report on Wednesday.

What’s the best buy in the banks?

Citi is the cheapest of the four biggest U.S.-based global money center banks — still trading at a 30% discount to its peak market value (which was pre-financial crisis). Today it’s far better capitalized, better regulated and a more efficient business than it was in the pre-financial crisis days.

What about valuation?  The average tangible  book value of the big four banks is 1.4.  Citi trades at just book value (i.e. 1x).

If you haven’t signed up for my Billionaire’s Portfolio, join now — get your risk free access here.

July 12,  5:00 pm EST

Stocks will finish the week on new record highs, and up 20% for the year.

With the catalysts lining up on a rate cut, and the potential for Trump to (then) pull the levers on trade and infrastructure, we have a path for a very big year in stocks.

Remember, since December, we’ve talked about the comparisons between 1994-1995 and 2018-2019.

The Fed was overly aggressive in raising rates back in the mid 90s, into a low inflation, recovering economy.  In ’94, the fear that Fed policy would kill the recovery, led to a world where the best return on your money was in cash.  Fast forward to 2018, the Fed also doubled interest rates in a short period of time and the fear set in that the Fed would kill the recovery.  Cash, again, was the highest returning major asset class.

By July of ’95 the Fed was forced to reverse course and cut rates.  Stocks finished that year up 36%.  Here we are, again, with a July rate cut coming to reverse the course on monetary policy.

As we end the week, let’s take a look at broader market, style and asset class returns in ’95 compared to 2019, year-to-date.

If you haven’t signed up for my Billionaire’s Portfolio, join now — get your risk free access here.

July 11,  5:00 pm EST

The markets have been obsessed with the Fed this week.  Let’s talk about something else.  How about earnings?

Second quarter earnings will kick into gear on Monday, starting with the big banks. And we are doing so with stocks on record highs, with the expectations of a rate cut coming down the pike for month end.

We’ll hear from Citi on Monday.  JP Morgan and Wells Fargo report on Tuesday.

Remember, S&P 500 earnings grew by better than 20% in 2018, thanks to a corporate tax cut and the hottest economy of the past decade.

Then we had a sharp decline in stocks.  That’s a shock to confidence.  When confidence takes a hit, the expectations bar gets lowered.  Before stocks unraveled in December, Wall Street was looking for 8.3% earnings growth for full year 2019.  Now they are looking for just 2.6% growth for the year.

As I’ve said, never underestimate the appetite of Wall Street and corporate America to dial down expectations when given the opportunity.  That sets the table for positive surprises.  And positive surprises are fuel for stocks.   Stocks are fuel for confidence.  Confidence is fuel for the economy.

We saw it in Q1.  The bar was low, and expectations were beat – both on earnings and economic growth. The stock market had the best first quarter in 20 years and Reuters called it the best first half for global financial markets ever.

As for Q2 earnings:  The consensus view is for S&P 500 earnings to contract by 2.6%.

Interestingly, with three weeks until the Fed meeting, the softer the earnings season, the stronger the case is for a bigger rate cut.  However, if we do indeed get positive surprises in the earnings, we still get a cut – so long as Trump continues to telegraph an indefinite trade war.

If you haven’t signed up for my Billionaire’s Portfolio, join now — get your risk free access here.

July 10,  5:00 pm EST

Jerome Powell was on Capitol Hill today, with another opportunity to set expectations on what the Fed may or may not do on July 31.

He didn’t disappoint.  In the Fed Chair’s prepared remarks, he acknowledged that the “crosscurrents” (i.e. risks to the economic expansion) have reemerged (after moderating earlier in the year).  That’s code for, we don’t know how long Trump is going to holdout on a trade deal, and we will give the markets (and Trump) what they are asking for:  a rate cut at the month’s end.

The table was set in June for the Fed to cut rates.  They held off, in anticipation of the big Trump/Xi meeting that took place at the end of June.  A deal would have meant the Fed was off the hook – no rate cuts.  As we know, they (Trump/Xi) kicked the can down the road.  That reset the timeline on the trade war to indefinite.

And that sets the table for a response from the Fed.

In the absence of an indefinite trade war, are rates too tight in a 3% growth economy with unemployment under 4%.  No.

But the Fed appears ready to capitulate in Trump’s game of chicken. The market is forcing its hand.  With a 2% 10-year yield, the interest rate market is pricing in economic slowdown, deflationary pressures, aggressive monetary stimulus and maybe military war — all stemming from the perception of an indefinite trade war.  Those signals are threats to business and consumer confidence, the linchpin of the economy.

Game of chicken?  Remember, Trump likes to position himself so that he can control the outcome in many of the fights he has taken on/created.  China is no different. He is in the driver’s seat in the trade negotiation.  He can’t force a good deal, but he can claim victory on the trade front just by doing ‘a’ deal.

As we’ve discussed, with a rate cut under his belt, expect Trump to pull the trigger on ‘a’ deal, and then turn back to Congress to launch the next pillar in Trumponomics — a $2 trillion infrastructure spend.  Who killed the infrastructure negotiations back in May?  Trump.  Who can turn it back on?  Trump. Again, he creates fights where he can control the outcome.

If you haven’t signed up for my Billionaire’s Portfolio, join now — get your risk free access here.

July 9,  5:00 pm EST

As we are working through an important month for stocks and the economy, I want to revisit a chart I worked up early on in the financial crisis recovery (about seven years ago).

We’ve looked at this chart quite a bit, but it’s been about a year since we’ve discussed it here in my daily Pro Perspectives note.

In the chart below, the blue line represents what the S&P 500 would have looked like had it continued its long-run annualized growth rate of 8% from the 2007 (pre-crisis) peak.

This blue line gives us perspective on where we stand in this stock market recovery.

Now, the orange line is the actual path of stocks (S&P 500).  What’s the point?

Even though we’re up more than four-fold from the 2009 bottom, and people continue to talk about how long this bull market has run, we still have not recovered the lost growth of the past decade.

That is clearly displayed in the GAP between the orange line (the actual S&P 500) and the blue line (where stocks would be had we continued along the 8% annualized path).

What can we attribute this gap to?  Post-recession recoveries are typically driven by an aggressive bounce-back in growth.  We didn’t get it.  Instead, the post-recession growth environment of the past decade was dangerously shallow and slow.

With that in mind, there is a similar gap in economic growth relative to trend.  Historically, growth slowdowns are followed by big bounce-backs in growth, to return the the path of the economy to “trend growth.”  We haven’t had it.

 

July 8,  5:00 pm EST

Following the quiet Independence Day holiday last week, today Wall Street begins to position for what will be a very important July.

After a rate hiking cycle that has spanned from December 2015 to December 2018, the Fed is expected to cut rates on July 31–reversing course on it’s post-crisis monetary policy “normalization” program.

Now, the view toward just how aggressive the rate cut will be, has swung to a more moderate stance in recent days, following Friday’s hot jobs number.

But just in case we need more Fed speculation in the market heading into the end of the month, we’ll hear more posturing from Jay Powell (the Fed chair) three times this week. He has a prepared speech at the Boston Fed event tomorrow. And then he’s scheduled to give his semi-annual testimony to Congress on Wednesday and Thursday (along with Q&A to follow).

We enter this week with stocks trading near 3,000 on the S&P — that’s 4.5x higher than the 2009 lows. That incorporates about seven years of zero-interest rate policy, $4 trillion of QE. But as you can see in the chart below, three-years of rate hikes have not derailed the stock market recovery. The S&P 500 is up more than 40% and sitting on record highs.

 

 

What gives? While the Fed has tightened 225 basis points, market-determined interest rates haven’t followed. The benchmark 10-year yield stands just where it was when the Fed launched QE (i.e. a yield around 2%). That has continued to push people toward higher risk (relative to bonds) in search of return.

And this soft market-determined interest rate environment has been a huge contributor to this next chart.

Mortgage rates have remained very low. And that has driven the continued housing market recovery (to new record highs)–a huge driver of the economic recovery.

What has caused the decoupling of market-determined interest rates from Fed rates? Remember, while the Fed has been reversing emergency level policies, both Europe and Japan have continued to print money and buy assets (among them, U.S. Treasurys–which puts downward pressure on market interest rates).

While the U.S. economy seems to have taken rate hikes in stride, the rest of the world hasn’t. And ultimately that has become the catalyst for a reversal of course for the Fed.

If you haven’t signed up for my Billionaire’s Portfolio, join now — get your risk free access here.

July 1,  5:00 pm EST

Predictably, Trump extended the timeline on new tariffs in his meeting with China’s President Xi over the weekend.

This is kicking the trade war can down the road. That extends the timeline on the trade war and resets the opportunity to force the Fed’s hand this coming month–to get a rate cut at the July 30-31 Fed meeting.

As we’ve discussed, with a rate cut under his belt, this would clear the way for Trump to, then, claim victory on the China trade war by doing ‘a’ deal, giving himself enough runway into the 2020 elections to have a booming stock market and booming economy.

Since December, we’ve been talking about the parallels between the current period and the 1994-1995 period. It’s worth repeating again. The script continues to play out. In 1994, an overly aggressive Fed raised rates into a recovering, low inflation economy. By 1995, they were cutting. That led to a 36% rise in stocks in 1995. And it led to 4% growth in the economy through late 2000–18 consecutive quarters of more than 4% growth. Stocks tripled over the five-year period.

Think about that, and then remove the overhang of a trade war with the two biggest economies of the world and you can see the path to some very good times ahead. Moreover, if the above scenario plays out, Trump would then likely turn back to Congress and green-light a $2 trillion infrastructure plan.

While many have been predicting economic bust, this is a formula for an economic boom!

June 28,  5:00 pm EST

We end the week, month and quarter today.  Stocks are up 17% year-to-date.

With the big Trump/Xi meeting coming over the weekend, let’s talk about how Fed policy has flipped from a headwind (adding to the risks), to a tailwind (backstopping against the risks – an implicit “put”).

And that’s why the chart on the S&P 500 looks like this …   

 

 

Of course we’ve had big geopolitical risks along the timeline of this chart, that include an historic trade war (which continues) and potential sanctions against Saudi Arabia (late last year).

The geopolitics have consumed the markets attention. But maybe it’s all about the Fed, and their ability to interpret (or lack thereof) the impact of trade disputes and structural reform in the global economy – and position correctly.

If we look back at the timeline, the tops and bottoms in these V-shaped moves in the chart above all align perfectly with Fed speak.

Stocks topped on October 3rd and proceeded to drop 20% through the end of December.  What happened on October 3rd?  The Fed chair, Jay Powell, did a sit down interview with PBS, where he said, after raising rates three times for the year, that they remain far away from the ‘neutral’ rate.  And he said they may go past neutral. Why?  He thought tariffs and the uptick in wage growth would feed into inflation.  He was wrong.

With that view of tighter and tighter monetary policy into a low inflation and recovering economy, with hurdles of trade reform in the path, the markets started signaling the contra-viewpoint:  the trade war weighs on global growth, and within that context, rising U.S. rates are a killer for emerging market economies, and for the slow recovering developed markets.

Powell’s comments started the decline, which ultimately led to a big decline. Yet, the tone-deaf Fed raised rates in December, again, right into a falling stock market.  Moreover, following the December Fed meeting, the Fed made it clear that they were prepared to mechanically keep raise rates — another four times in 2019.

When did it turn?  It turned the day (January 4th) the Fed marched out Powell, Bernanke and Yellen, (tails between their legs) to tell the world ‘no more rate hikes/ the Fed is done.’

Stocks bottomed, on that day, and did a perfect ‘V’ back to the record highs over the following months.

When did it top again?  May 1.  What happened on May 1?  The Fed met and Jay Powell had his post-meeting press conference.  After months of running Fed officials out in the media to tell us the Fed’s got your back, Powell fumbled.

The interest rate market (10-year yields) had fallen 75 basis points from the highs of just six months prior, giving a very clear message to the Fed that, at the very least, the December hike was a policy mistake.  But Powell was unwilling to show any leaning toward a rate cut. In fact, he said the risks that precipitated their “pause” on the rate path (China and European growth, Brexit risks, and trade negotiations), have been largely improving.  Again, the Fed was tone-deaf and unwilling to take a defensive stance against the unknowns of geopolitical risks.  Stocks go down.

A few days later, U.S./China trade talks come to a standstill.  Stocks continue on for a 7% decline.

When did stocks bottom? June 3rd.  What happened?  A voting Fed member, Jim Bullard said that a Fed cut may be “warranted soon” to “provide some insurance” in case of a sharper slowdown. That was a primer for a June 4th speech by Jay Powell.  Powell came out of the gates, in a prepared speech that morning, telling us they “will act as appropriate to sustain the expansion.” That spurred the second “V-shaped recovery” on the above chart.

The conversation at the Fed has now, finally, turned to rate cuts.  And the market is now expecting a 100% chance the Fed will cut at the July 31 meeting.

Perhaps now the Fed is in the right position, trade deal or no trade deal. And that should be very good for stocks.

Remember, the last time the Fed was in this position in 1994, they cut rates and that led to a huge year for stocks — and stocks and the economy boomed through the end of the nineties.

June 27,  5:00 pm EST

Bitcoin has had another huge move over the past three months — more than tripling.  And then late yesterday afternoon, it collapsed 15% in just minutes.  It lost 25% in value on the day.

The first rise and fall in Bitcoin, from $1,000 to $19,000 and back to $3,000, took place from early 2017 to early 2018.  Most of the move was over just four months.

Here’s a look at the chart.  You can see the first run-up and this most recent run-up …

 

 

Remember, this first run-up had everything money moving out of China, and less to do with Silicon Valley genius/ global monetary system disruption.

In late 2016, with rapid expansion of credit in China, growing non-performing loans, a soft economy and the prospects of a Trump administration that could put pressure on China trade, capital was moving aggressively out of China.  That’s when the government stepped UP capital controls — better policing movement of capital out of China, from transfers to foreign investment (individuals can move just $50,000 out of the country a year).

Of course, resourceful Chinese still found ways to move money.  Among them, buying Bitcoin. And that’s when Bitcoin started to really move (from sub-$1,000). China cryptocurrency exchanges were said to account for 90% of global bitcoin trading. Capital flows were confused with Silicon Valley genius.

But in September of last year China crackdown on Bitcoin – with a total ban.  A few months later, Bitcoin futures launched, which gave hedge funds a liquid way to short the madness. Bitcoin topped the day the futures contract launched.  And a few months later it was worth 1/6th of its value at the top.

Is this time different?  Is this real traction for Bitcoin, or is this just Chinese capital flows looking for a parking place, again?  Likely, the latter.  It’s probably no coincidence that as the prospects of a ‘no deal’ with China have elevated in recent months, Bitcoin has again been on the move.  As we’ve discussed, if Trump holds firm on his demands, it seems impossible that China can do his deal.  It’s political suicide for the Chinese Communist Party.  With that, they fight tariffs with a devaluation of the yuan.

With those prospects, if you have money in China, you have been getting it out!  While cryptocurrency exchanges have been banned in China, owning and buying Bitcoin in China is not banned.  The Bitcoin futures market and off-exchange (peer-to-peer) trading are liquidity sources for Chinese citizens to respond to potential devaluation in the yuan.

With the above in mind, this round of Bitcoin bubble may not deflate until/unless Trump makes concessions to do a deal (which seems unlikely until, at least, we get past the July Fed meeting).

If you haven’t signed up for my Billionaire’s Portfolio, don’t delay … we’ve just had another big exit in our portfolio, and we’ve replaced it with the favorite stock of the most revered investor in corporate America — it’s a stock with double potential.

Join now and get your risk free access by signing up here.

June 26,  5:00 pm EST

This morning Mnuchin was interviewed by CNBC.  He was the headline of the day, despite saying nothing new.

When trade talks broke down in early May, the Trump administration said they were 90% of the way to a deal.  But China balked and reneged on concessions.   Mnuchin said the same thing today (we were 90% there), and the media presented it as if he said progress was made this week, heading into the meetings. That’s not what he said.

Let’s talk about the backdrop heading into the weekend negotiations.  Remember, Trump is in the driver’s seat in this negotiation.  He can’t force a good deal, but he can claim victory on the trade front just by doing ‘a’ deal.

With that in mind, as we’ve discussed over the past month, he seems to be attempting to surgically optimize the economy heading into next year’s election.  He’s been fighting for a Fed rate cut, and through introducing heightened risks of a standstill on trade, he’s gotten what looks like Fed compliance coming down the pike (for a July cut).

The timeline set up perfectly for a June rate cut, and then for Trump to settle on a China deal at the G20 meeting.  The economy would have launched like a rocket-ship.  The Fed didn’t comply.

With that, at this weekends Trump/Xi meeting, let’s see if Trump extends the timeline on new tariffs, to get through the July Fed meeting (in hopes of getting his Fed fuel for the economy).   At this point, the market has backed the Fed into the corner, with high expectations of not just 25 bps, but a 50 bps cut.  Without an extension of trade uncertainty, those expectations will sustain if not grow.

Now, we’ve discussed over the past month, the prospects for this trade war with China ending with a grand and coordinated currency agreement — perhaps a big depreciation of the dollar, similar to the 80s “Plaza Accord.”

As I said a couple of weeks ago, we may wake up one day and find a similar agreement has been made between the U.S. and major global trading partners (which may include China, or not).  It might be a deal between the U.S. and China to “revalue” the yuan (i.e. strengthen it).  Or it may exclude China (just G3 economies).  An interesting takeaway from this morning’s interview with Mnuchin:  Mnuchin did make a point to emphasize that they look forward to many bi-lateral meetings at the G-20 — not just with China.

How do you position for a dollar devaluation?  Buy commodities.  Is that what the move in gold is telling us (and Bitcoin)?  Maybe.

If you haven’t signed up for my Billionaire’s Portfolio, don’t delay … we’ve just had another big exit in our portfolio, and we’ve replaced it with the favorite stock of the most revered investor in corporate America — it’s a stock with double potential.

Join now and get your risk free access by signing up here.