August 26, 2020

The hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico has been upgraded to a category 4.  That will make landfall tonight. 

We've talked about this storm, and the resulting supply disruption that may prove to be a catalyst to get oil prices moving.

What oil and gas companies would benefit from higher oil prices?  All of them.  

Remember, we came into the year with a bubbling confrontation with Iran and with a U.S. economy that was positioned for the hottest stretch of growth in two decades.  It was a formula for $100+ oil.  And that backdrop would have solidified the comeback and sustainability of the shale industry. And then the rug was pulled out — from the events you can see annotated in this chart …

This plunge in oil prices put practically everyone on default watch: the energy industry, banks that lend to the energy industry, countries that are heavily dependent on oil revenues (and everyone that deals with these entities, relies on them as part of their business or daily lives, lends money to them, etc — i.e. makings for a total global meltdown).  

With that, if there was any question about whether or not policymakers would/should fire the bazooka of monetary and fiscal stimulus, the collapse in oil made it an easy decision. 
 
As part of the policy mix, the Fed brought the U.S. energy industry back from the brink of death by becoming an outright buyer of corporate bonds.  So, these distressed companies have been able to raise money, to stay afloat, now they need higher oil prices.

And with the exception of a position Carl Icahn has (and has had) in Occidental Petroleum, no one has these stocks.  Wall Street has left the industry for dead.  That probably makes these U.S. oil and gas stocks a buy. 
 

August 25, 2020

Yesterday we talked about the catalyst for a move in crude oil.

Today, crude was up as much as 2.8%.  

The storm brewing in the Gulf has now caused nearly 300 oil and gas drilling platform closures, which represents over 80% of the production from that area.  And the forecast on the storm has now been upgraded to a major hurricane (category 3) by landfall.  Harvey was a category 4, two years ago. 

Like Harvey, this storm will likely impact refinery operations that are near the shoreline as well — which should further disrupt production and the supply chain.   

Again, this is all developing into a catalyst to get oil prices moving (higher).

In addition, overnight it was reported that the U.S. and China had positive talks on carrying out phase one of the trade deal.  Within that agreement, China has a commitment to buy, in addition to their normal annual imports from the U.S., $12.5 billion of agricultural commodities, and $18.5 billion of energy-related commodities.  

As you can see in the chart below, at seven full months into the year, China is well behind on its commitment – to the tune of about $10 billion in ag spend, and about $12 billion in energy. 

With that information, not surprisingly, commodities led the way today.  Coffee was up 3.4%.  Nat gas was up 3.2%.  Corn was up 2.6%.  Lean hogs, up 2.6%. Lumber, up 2.3%. Soybeans, up 1.6%. Wheat, up 1.5%. 

Now, a fair question:  Do we really want China to fulfill on this commitment right now?  

It was just a month ago, that Pompeo made the case for building an alliance of "free nations" to stand up against the Chinese government, calling for regime change, and calling the Chinese Communist Party a threat to the free world.  The media gave little coverage to this speech, which sounded at best like a cold war declaration (at worst, like a 'hot' war declaration).  If you didn't see it, you can find the transcripts here

So, given that we are emerging from an economic crisis, that has already resulted in a supply shock, do we really want to be sending our food and energy to China?  And do we want to do so, in a fragile economy, knowing that it will put upward pressure on prices, where inflation is already brewing. 

August 24, 2020

We talked about crude oil late last week. Let’s continue on this theme today, as two supply disrupting storms make their way through the Gulf of Mexico. 

As we’ve discussed, oil has been disconnected from a very hot stock market. Stocks are hitting new record highs.  Oil prices are down 35% from the highs of the year. 

Apple, the biggest company in the world, has doubled in value (to over $2 trillion over the past two years).  The value of crude oil has been nearly cut in half over the same period.  

Meanwhile, we are in the early stages of an aggressive bounceback in economic growth (projecting +26% annualized for Q3, at the moment).  The dollar is falling, and inflation is brewing, as money pours into popular inflation hedges (with gold and silver leading the way). 

And yet, crude oil (globally traded primarily in dollars) trades just in the low $40s.  

Is it lacking a catalyst?    

Well, historically, supply disruptions are often a powerful catalyst to get oil moving. 

And we may now have a catalyst. 

With the storms in the gulf (or on that path), over 100 rigs have already been evacuated, accounting for 58% of the oil production in the Gulf.

What could it mean for oil prices (in combination with the backdrop we laid out in the above)?

Let’s take a look back at oil prices from August of 2017, when Hurricane Harvey, a category 4, tracked through the Gulf and devastated Texas.

Harvey hit over the weekend in late August of 2017. It was a big one. Both offshore platforms, and onshore refineries were hit hard.  The fallout was assessed over the following days, and by the end of the week, the bottom was in for oil.  Within 12 months, crude was trading over $70. 

August 21, 2020

We talked about the outlook for inflation. 

Global central banks have explicitly devalued cash, flooding the world with trillions of dollars of new money (excess liquidity).  Add to that we’ve have a supply chain disruption, meeting a demand shock.  And as the economy regains it’s prior capacity, it’s unlikely that supply will be able to ramp at the same rate that demand will ramp.  We should expect prices to be higher. 

We’re seeing the excess liquidity effect on stocks (record higher prices).  And we’re seeing both the excess liquidity effect and supply/demand mismatch effect in real estate (record high prices).  

We’re seeing it in some commodities (gold is up 27%, silver up 49%), but most commodities remain cheap, but for how long?   

Let’s take a look at some charts …

The broad commodity index is still down 20% from the highs of the year, and coming from a very low base (record lows). 

Oil is down 35% from the highs of the year. 

Food prices remain down on the year.  

What’s up, big?  Lumber. 

Lumber is up 94% on the year.  The price is up 230% from the April 1 bottom.

Is this what supply disruption meeting a demand surge might look like in broad commodities at some point in the near future?  Maybe.

August 20, 2020

Yesterday, we talked about the $2 trillion valuation of Apple. 

And we observed the disconnect between the value of the biggest company in the world, and the value of the most important natural resource in the world.  While Apple has doubled over the past two years, the price of oil has about halved.  

What’s the relationship?  Well, one might think that the performance of Apple is a proxy on the global economy — foretelling, not just an aggressive economic recovery, but one where global asset prices (generally) will be inflated by the excess stimulus money floating around.  

Maybe you would expect something like this relationship we saw through the economic ebbs and flows of 2016-2019 …

This relationship hasn’t happened.  Oil has only returned to pre-lockdown levels (flat-ish). While Apple is up 80% over the same period.

Interestingly, Tesla has also made a huge run since the Pandemic was globally recognized back in early March.  The stock has more than tripled from that point — and up nearly 6x from the lows of mid March. 

Does this have anything to do with oil?  Maybe.  It may have a lot to do with oil and climate change activism. 

Climate change activists believe that climate change is an existential threat to the world.  And because they view Trump as a climate change denier, they have explicitly said he is an existential threat to the world.  

If they believe he is an existential threat, to what extent would they be willing to fight to remove him from office?  At the very least, let’s just say that the virus has created a path to his removal. 
 
With that, consider that the financial backing of climate change activism is nearly unlimited.  A group called Climate Action 100+ has the most powerful investors in the world (representing $32 trillion in assets under management).  And they  are dictating how major energy companies are deploying capital on new projects – forcing the pivot to climate responsible initiatives.  And then you have every major global government entity/cooperative behind the activist movement, feeding the effort with cash and subsidies.   
 
Now, with that, it seems clear that global capital has indiscriminately plowed into Tesla (likely by the entities mentioned above), as if this company represents the contra-oil industry.  If that’s the case, at a market cap of $360 billion, Tesla as an “industry”, relative to oil and gas, is cheap.   
 

August 19, 2020

Stocks reversed into the end of the day, after printing a new record high. 

This comes on the day that Apple became the first two trillion-dollar company.  Just two years ago (almost to the day), Apple became the first one trillion-dollar company. 

Want to replicate Warren Buffett's portfolio?  Put about half of your money in Apple, and you're about there.  Buffett now has $133 billion worth of Apple — 45% of Berkshire Hathaway. 

If we look back to the first crossing of that trillion-dollar market cap threshold, by Apple, it wasn't long before both Amazon (September of 2018) and Microsoft (April of 2019) joined the party.  

Will they follow Apple's lead again?  Very likely.  Both are valued at $1.6 trillion at the moment. 

This is either what it looks like when money around the world finds a store-of-value in monopolies (it's like buying gold), or we're looking at the early signs of a global reset of all asset prices, thanks to the trillions of dollars-worth of new money that policymakers have dumped onto the world.  It's probably both. 

This is not necessarily reflecting a higher value, just a higher price.  And that's a formula for a lower quality of life.  

Conversely, what's the right price for oil, if these stocks are foretelling a global recovery?  Back in August of 2018, when Apple became the first trillion-dollar company, oil was trading over $70.  Today, it's trading $42. 

 

August 18, 2020

With the S&P closing at a new record high today, I want to revisit my note from March 24th, the day after the stock market bottomed. 

Here's an excerpt from that note (link here):

"Make no mistake, with global governments and central banks following the 'print and backstop everything/everyone policies' we have explicit devaluations of currencies.  That makes it a 'buy everything' market.

This is the global "debt monetization" event people thought we were witnessing during the Global Financial Crisis (GFC).  The difference?  In the GFC, people thought the result of the Fed's actions would be hyperinflationary, and therefore a defacto debt and currency devauation.  It didn't happen.  When you give people money in a debt crisis, they hoard it.  With that, we didn't get hyperinflation, instead we got a deflationary bust

The Virus War is the opposite.  Never has there been a more applicable environment to inflate away the value of everything (in the medium term) to keep the economy (the world) intact (in the near term).  It's the only option. 

Again, as we discussed yesterday, this is a brew for massive inflation when we come out on the other side of the virus.  That means, just as people are wanting to hold cash, it's the worst place to be.  The early evidence:  Almost everything (all global assets) was up today. 

With this backdrop, the first place you look, as a preservation of buying power:  gold."  

As we discussed back in this March note, the policy response made it (and continues to make it) a "buy everything market."  Let's take a glimpse of what that has looked like since that March 23rd low in stocks (a little less than five months ago). 

The S&P 500 is up 56%.  Oil is up 91%.  Gold is up 33%. Copper is up 41%.   

Now, as we also discussed in my notes surrounding that stock market low, "in historical crises Wall Street panics well before Main Street panics."  That was the case once again.  By the time the economic shut down hit, and Main Street started panicking, the bottom for Wall Street was near. 

 

So, now Wall Street has recovered.  And not surprisingly, well before Main Street has recovered.  And Wall Street is now pricing in a wave of inflation.  That's whats next for Main Street.
 

August 17, 2020

We’ve had a crazy seven months.  The next two-and-a-half months may be even crazier, heading an election that has big global ramifications. 

The stakes are extremely high.

Let’s step back and gain some perspective on just how high the stakes are/must be…

It’s now seven months since the first virus case was diagnosed in the U.S.  And in the days and weeks that followed, through social media, we saw imagery from China, of hazmat officials disinfecting streets.  We saw videos of Chinese officials welding Wuhan residents into their homes.  We saw videos of residents dropping dead in the middle of the street.

 
I think it’s clear now that there has been plenty of propaganda coming out of China, infiltrating our media. 

Now that we have data, and seven months of history with the virus on the ground in the U.S., the world looks far less scary.  

 
As we discussed last week, the virus isn’t nearly as deadly as it was initially said to be.  If we assume, as the CDC does, that we are only diagnosing at best 1 out of every 10 infected, then the death rate is quickly converging toward the annual flu rate.
   
Remember, all along, we’ve discussed what China has to lose, if they are faced with another four years of Trump.  It reveals their desperation.
 
Let’s revisit …

China has spent the past 40 years executing on a plan to rise to a global power.

The Chinese currency was its primary tool. By massively devaluing the yuan in the 1980s through the early 1990s, and then keeping it artificially cheap through a variety of managed peg strategies for the past 25+ years, China became the exporter to the world.  The Chinese economy exploded in size, growing 37-fold since the early 80s, while the U.S. economy has grown just 3-fold. This has put China on the footsteps of its goal of global leadership.

And Trump’s economic plan (demanding that China play by the same rules as its trading partners) has derailed it all. If Trump wins, and they abide by a trade deal, the Chinese economy falls out of the race for global power.  If Trump wins, and they don’t play ball, but get put into the penalty box by global trading partners (allies Pompeo is building as I write), they also fall out of the race for global power.  The stakes are extremely, extremely high for China (and the world).

August 14, 2020

We are now halfway through the third quarter.  And this is the quarter where we will begin to see very clearly that the response is MUCH greater than the damage.

Remember, the economy is down $2.3 trillion from the Q4 peak.

And yet we have more than $6.6 trillion worth of fiscal and monetary stimulus still working through the system. 

So what does Q3 look like? 

The Atlanta Fed model is currently projecting 26% annualized economic growth for the third quarter.

The easy math on this says that the economic loss is, and will be, aggressively replenished – maybe even by the year end. 

And that will leave us with trillions and trillions of dollars worth of new money floating around the economy. 

Make no mistake, this is by design. Back in March, when Mnuchin and Powell were confronted with an apocalyptic scenario, they had one option, flood the world with money, reflate GDP and devalue debt.

Things are going according to plan.  The downside?  Inflation is coming. 

With that, we looked at this chart of gold a couple of weeks ago, which projects a move to $2,700.  It has since traded as high as $2,072.

And here’s a look at Bitcoin.  This big downtrend broke in late July.  

August 13, 2020

About a month ago, as all of the "spiking cases" hysteria was being peddled by the media, we took a sober look at the raw data (from Harvard, here), and concluded that the rise in cases, was simply representing the slow closing of the gap between the reported infection rate and what the CDC believes to be the real infection rate (at least 10 times as many), while revealing a death rate that is converging toward the annual flu death rate.  

That has indeed been the case.  

As we discussed, the rate of change in cases has only led to the rate-of-change in deaths-to-cases declining, and declining rapidly.  

Let's take a look at some updated charts …

First, here's another look at the path of the "case fatality rate" (my charts).

Again, as we discussed last month, despite the fears that the higher case numbers were going to result in more New York-like crises around the country, it hasn't happened. 

The death rate has gone down since mid-May, and it has done so for a couple of reasons:  1) treatment options are working, and 2) the large majority of people are simply defeating the disease on their own, and more of those types are being revealed with more testing — and those people are testing because they are being forced to test to return to work OR because they simply can, now that testing is, largely, open and free for asymptomatics.  

Next, remember, the CDC chief told us that we've likely only diagnosed about 10% of those that have, or have had, the disease in this country. That's based on surveys of blood samples taken around the country.  So the CDC thinks the infection rate (i.e. cases) should be multiplied by a factor of 10.  

That CDC projection now brings the number down within the range of annual flu deaths (0.33% in the above chart). 

If we assume that were only diagnosing 1 out of 20, the COVID death rate goes to 0.17%.  The 10-year average U.S. flu death rate is 0.13%.