August 7, 2017, 4:00 pm EST               Invest Alongside Billionaires For $297/Qtr

James Bullard, the President of the St. Louis Fed, said today that even if unemployment went to 3% it would have little impact on the current low inflationevironment. That’s quite a statement.  And with that, he argued no need to do anything with rates at this stage.​And he said the low growth environment seems to be well intact too — even though we well exceeded the target the Fed put on employment years ago.  In the Bernanke Fed, they slapped a target on unemployment at 6.5% back in 2012, which, if reached, they said they would start removing accomodation, including raising rates. The assumption was that the recovery in jobs to that point would stoke inflation to the point it would warrant normalization policy. Yet, here we are in the mid 4%s on unemployment and the Fed’s favored inflation guage has not only fallen short of their 2% target, its trending the other way (lower).

​As I’ve said before, what gets little attention in this “lack of inflation” confoundment, is the impact of the internet. With the internet has come transparency, low barriers-to-entry into businesses (and therefore increased competition), and reduced overhead. And with that, I’ve always thought the Internet to be massively deflationary. When you can stand in a store and make a salesman compete on best price anywhere in the country–if not world–prices go down.

And this Internet 2.0 phase has been all about attacking industries that have been built upon overcharging and underdelivering to consumers. The power is shifting to the consumer and it’s resulting in cheaper stuff and cheaper services.  And we’re just in the early stages of the proliferation of consumer to consumer (C2C) business — where neighbors are selling products and services to other neighbors, swapping or just giving things away.  It all extracts demand from the mainstream business and forces them to compete on price and improve service.  So we get lower inflation.  But maybe the most misunderstood piece is how it all impacts GDP.  Is it all being accounted for, or is it possible that we’re in a world with better growth than the numbers would suggest, yet accompanied by very low inflation?

Join our Billionaire’s Portfolio and get my most recent recommendation – a stock that can double on a resolution on healthcare. Click here to learn more.  

 

June 30, 2017, 7:00 pm EST               Invest Alongside Billionaires For $297/Qtr

Without a doubt, there was a significant shift in the outlook on central bank monetary policy this week.  In fact, the events of the week may represent the official market acceptance of the “end of the easy money” era.

Draghi told us deflation is over and reflation is on.  Yellen told us we should not expect another financial crisis in our lifetimes.  Carney at the Bank of England told us removal of stimulus is likely to become necessary, and up for debate “in the coming months.” And even the Finance Minister in Japan joined in, saying Japan was recovery from deflation.

​With that, in a world where “reflation” is underway, rates and commodities lead the way.

​Here’s a look at the chart on the 10-year yield again. We looked at this on Tuesday.  I said, the “Bottom May Be In For Oil and Yields.”  That was the dead bottom. Rates bounced hard off of this line we’ve been watching …

This reflation theme confirmed by central banks has put a bid under commodities…

That’s especially important for oil, which had been trading down to very dangerous levels, the levels that begin threatening the solvency of oil producers.


That’s a 9% bounce for oil from the lows of last week!

​This all looks like the beginning of another leg of recovery for commodities and rates (with the catalyst of this central bank guidance). Which likely means a lower dollar (as we discussed earlier this week).  And a quieter broad stock market (until growth data begins to reflect a break out of the sub 2% GDP funk).

​Have a great weekend.

Join the Billionaire’s Portfolioto hear more of my big picture analysis and get my hand-selected, diverse stock portfolio following the lead of the best activist investors in the world.

 

 

June 28, 2017, 4:00 pm EST                                                                               Invest Alongside Billionaires For $297/Qtr

 

BR caricatureYesterday we talked about the Draghi remarks (head of the European Central Bank) that were intended to set expectations that the ECB might be moving toward the exit doors on QE and zero interest rate policy.  That bottomed out global rates — which popped U.S. rates further today.  The Bank of England piled on today, talking about rate normalization soon.

We’ve gone from 2.12% in the U.S. ten year yield to 2.25% in about 24 hours.  These are big swings in the interest rate market – a big bounce and, as I’ve said, the bottom appears to be in for rates.

As importantly, this prepared speech by Draghi could very well cement the top in the dollar.  It begins to tighten a very wide interest rate spread between the U.S. and global rates.  We entered the year with the Fed going one way (tightening) while the rest of the world was going the other way (easing).  That’s a recipe for capital to storm into U.S. assets — into the dollar.  And now that may be over.

I’ve been researching long-term cycles in the dollar for a very long time and throughout the global financial crisis period, it these cycles in the world’s reserve currency have been my guidepost for drawing a lot of conclusions on markets and the outlook for capital flows over the past several years.

Despite the choppiness in the dollar for much of the crisis, if we look back at the cycles following the failure of the Bretton Woods system, we were able, very early on, to determine the dollar was in a bull cycle.

This view came in the face of all of the negative global sentiment toward the dollar in 2010.  Foreign leaders were taking shots at the Fed, accusing the Fed of trying to destroy the dollar.  People were calling for the end of the dollar as the world’s reserve currency. All the while, the dollar held firm and ultimately made an aggressive climb.

Take a look below at my chart on the long term dollar cycles…

june 28 dollar cycles lt

I’ve watched this chart for quite some time, defining the five complete dollar cycles over the past nearly 40 years, and the most recent bull cycle.

If we mark the top of the most recent cycle in early January, this bull cycle has matched the longest cycle in duration (at 8.8 years) and comes in just shy of the long-term average performance of the five complete cycles.  The most recent bull cycle added 47%.  The average change over a long term cycle has been 56%.  This all argues that the dollar bull cycle is over.  And a weaker dollar is ahead.  That should go over very well with the Trump administration.

Join the Billionaire’s Portfolioto hear more of my big picture analysis and get my hand-selected, diverse stock portfolio following the lead of the best activist investors in the world.

  

 

 

 

February 13, 2017, 4:00pm EST

Today we heard from Janet Yellen in the first part of her semi-annual testimony to Congress.  She gave prepared remarks to the Senate today and took questions.  Tomorrow it will be the House.  The prepared statement will be the same, with maybe a few different questions.

Remember, just four months ago, the most important actor in the global economy was the Fed.  Central banks were in control (as they have been for the better part of 10 years), with the Fed leading the way.

The Fed was the ultimate puppet master.  By keeping rates ultra-low and standing ready to act against anything that might destabilize the global economy and threaten to kill the dangerously slow recovery, they (along with the help other major central banks) restored confidence, and created the stability and incentives to drive hiring, investing and spending — which created economic recovery.

When Greece bubbled up again, when oil threatened to shake the financial system, when China’s slowdown created uncertainty, central banks were quick to step in with more easing, bigger QE, promises of low rates for a very long time, etc..  And in some cases, they outright intervened, like when the ECB averted disaster in Italy and Spain by promising to buy unlimited amounts of Italian and Spanish government bonds to stop speculators from inciting a bond market collapse and a collapse of the euro and European Union.

This dynamic of central bank activism has changed.  The Fed, and central bank intervention in general, is no longer the only game in town. We have fiscal stimulus coming and structural change underway that has the chance to finally mend the decade long slump of the global economy.  That’s why today’s speech by the Fed Chair was no longer the biggest event of the week — not even the day.

The scripts has flipped. Where the Fed had been driver of recovery, they now have become the threat to recovery. So the interest in Fedwatching today is only to the extent that they may screw things up.

Moving too fast on interest rate hikes has the potential weaken or even undo the gains that stand to come from the pro-growth policies efforts from the new administration.

Remember, the Fed told us in December that they projected THREE hikes this year.  But keep in mind, they projected FOUR in December of 2015, for 2016, and we only got one. And that was only AFTER the election, and the swing in sentiment regarding the prospects of pro-growth policies.

Remember, Bernanke himself has criticized the Fed for stalling momentum in the recovery by showing too much tightening (i.e. over optimism) in their forecasts.  And he argued that the Fed should give the economy some room to run and sustain momentum, fighting inflation from behind.

On that note, the Fed has now witnessed the bumpy path that the new administration is dealing with, and will be traveling, in implementing policy.  I would think they would be less aggressive now in their view on rate hikes UNTIL they see evidence of policy execution, and a lot more evidence in the data.  Let’s hope that’s the case.

For help building a high potential portfolio for 2017, follow me in our Billionaire’s Portfolio, where you look over my shoulder as I follow the world’s best investors into their best stocks.  Our portfolio more than doubled the return of the S&P 500 in 2016.  You can join me here and get positioned for a big 2017.

 

January 31, 2017, 4:00pm EST                                                                                         Invest Alongside Billionaires For $297/Qtr

We have some key central bank meetings this week.

Remember, it wasn’t too long ago that the world was sitting on every word uttered by a central banker.  Those days are likely over — at least to the extreme extent of the past decade.  For now, Trump has supplanted central bankers as the most powerful policy maker in the world.

Still, the Fed will meet following their rate hike last month, the second in their very slow hiking cycle – 1/4 point hike twelve months apart.  They’ll do nothing this week, but the data tends to be going as desired by the Fed, and other major central banks for that matter (aside from Japan) — meaning, inflation has recovered and is nearing the target zone.

Remember, this time last year, the world was staring down the barrel of DE-flation again.  Inflation, central bankers have tools to combat.  Deflation is far more difficult, and far less predictable.  It can spiral and grind economies to a halt. When consumers are convinced prices will be cheaper in the future, they wait.  When they wait, economic activity stalls.  With that, deflation tends to create more deflation.  The fear of that scenario, and the potential of an irreversible spiral, is why central bankers were cutting rates to negative territory last year.

Where was the imminent deflationary threat coming from?  Slow economic activity, but mostly a crash in oil prices.

Central bankers have the tendency to change the rules of the game when it suits them.  When inflation is running hot, they may hold off on tightening money by pointing to hot “food and energy” prices. These are temporary influences, as they say.  Interestingly, they are much more aggressive, though, when oil prices are creating a deflationary threat – as they did last year.

With that, oil prices have doubled from the lows of last February.  So it shouldn’t be too surprising that inflation numbers are rising, and getting close to the desired targets (around 2%) of the central bankers of the U.S., Europe and England.

So will we see a turning point for global central banks (not just the Fed) in the months ahead?  The world has already been pricing in the likelihood that the pro-growth policies coming from the Trump administration will take the burden of manufacturing economic recovery off of the central banks.

But we may find that “transitory oil prices” will be the excuse for more inaction by the Fed, and continued QE from the ECB and BOE in the months ahead, which may result in a slower pace of rate hikes than both the Fed projected in December and the market has been anticipating.

Higher rates at this stage: 1) creates problems for the housing recovery, 2) promotes more capital flight from emerging markets like China (which means more dollar strength),and 3) threatens to neutralize the fiscal stimulus and reform coming down the pike for the U.S.

In December, the Fed dialed back their talk about letting the economy run hot (i.e. staying well behind the curve on inflation to make sure recovery is robust).   We’ll see if they switch gears again and start explaining away the inflation numbers to oil prices.

For help building a high potential portfolio for 2017, follow me in our Billionaire’s Portfolio, where you look over my shoulder as I follow the world’s best investors into their best stocks.  Our portfolio more than doubled the return of the S&P 500 in 2016.  You can join me here and get positioned for a big 2017.

 

October 27, 2016, 3:15pm EST

Last week we talked about the set up for a move in global bond yields.  And we discussed the case for why the bond market may have had it very wrong (i.e. rates have been too low, pricing in way too pessimistic a view on the current environment).

Well, today rates have finally started to remind people of how quickly things can change.  The U.S. 10 year yield finally broke above the tough 1.80% level and is now trading 1.85%. German yields have now swung from negative territory just three days ago, to POSITIVE 19 basis points at the highs today.  Importantly, German yields are now ABOVE pre-Brexit levels.

Still, we’re approaching a second Fed rate hike and U.S. yields are almost 1/2 point lower than where they traded just following the Fed’s first hike in December of last year. As for German rates (another key benchmark for world markets), we found with the Fed in its three iterations of QE, that QE made market rates go UP not down, as people began pricing in a better outlook. That’s yet to happen in Germany.  The 10 year yield was closer to 40 basis points when they formally kicked off QE – still above current levels.

But remember this chart we looked at last week.

oct27 germ rates

In the white box, you can see the screaming run-up in yields last year.  The rates markets had a massive position squeeze which sent ten–year German bond yields from 5 basis points (near zero) to 106 basis points in less than two months — a 20x move. U.S. ten–year yields (the purple line in the chart below) moved from 1.72% to 2.49% almost in lock–step.

This time around, as we discussed last week, let’s hope a rise in rates is orderly and not messy.  Another sharp rise in market rates like we had last year would destabilize global markets (including the very important U.S. housing market).

But the buffer this time around should be the Bank of Japan.  Remember, the Bank of Japan, just last month announced they would peg the Japanese 10 year yield at zero.  Even with the divergent monetary policies in Europe and Japan relative to the U.S. (central bank rate paths going in opposite directions), the spread between U.S. rates and European and Japanese rates should stay tame.  That means that Japan’s new policy of keeping their 10 year yield at zero will/should prevent a run away U.S. interest rate market – at least until there is a big upgrade in the expectation in U.S. growth. On that note, we get a U.S. GDP reading tomorrow.

Click here to get started and get your portfolio in line with our Billionaire’s Portfolio. 

 

September 21, 2016, 4:40pm EST

Yesterday we talked about the two big central bank events in focus today.  Given that the Bank of Japan had an unusual opportunity to decide on policy before the Fed (first at bat this week), I thought the BOJ could steal the show.
Indeed, the BOJ acted.  The Fed stood pat.  But thus far, the market response has been fairly muted – not exactly a show stealing response.  But as we’ve discussed, two key hammers for the BOJ in achieving a turnaround in inflation and the Japanese economy are: 1) a weaker yen, and 2) higher Japanese stocks.

Their latest tweaks should help swing those hammers.

Bernanke wrote a blog post today with his analysis on the moves in Japan.  Given he’s met with/advised the BOJ over the past few months, everyone should be perking up to hear his reaction.

Let’s talk about the moves from the BOJ …

One might think that the easy, winning headline for the BOJ (to influence stocks and the yen) would be an increase in the size of its QE program.  They kicked off in 2013 announcing purchases of 60 for 70 trillion yen ($800 billion) a year.  They upped the ante to 80 trillion yen in October of 2014. On that October announcement, Japanese stocks took off and the yen plunged – two highly desirable outcomes for the BOJ.

But all central bank credibility is in jeopardy at this stage in the global economic recovery.  Going back to the well of bigger asset purchases could be dangerous if the market votes heavily against it by buying yen and selling Japanese stocks.  After all, following three years of big asset purchases, the BOJ has failed to reach its inflation and economic objectives.

They didn’t take that road (the explicit bigger QE headline).  Instead, the BOJ had two big tweaks to its program.  First, they announced that they want to control the 10-year government bond yield.  They want to peg it at zero.

What does this accomplish?  Bernanke says this is effectively QE.  Instead of telling us the size of purchase, they’re telling us the price on which they will either or buy or sell to maintain.  If the market decides to dump JGB’s, the BOJ could end up buying more (maybe a lot more) than their current 80 trillion yen a year. Bernanke also calls the move to peg rates, a stealth monetary financing of government spending (which can be a stealth debt monetization).

Secondly, the BOJ said today that they want to overshoot their 2% inflation target, which Bernanke argues allows them to execute on their plans until inflation is sustainable.

It all looks like a massive devaluation of the yen scenario plays well with these policy moves in Japan, both as a response to these policies, and a complement to these policies (self-reinforcing).  Though the initial response in the currency markets has been a stronger yen.

If you’re looking for great ideas that have been vetted and bought by the world’s most influential and richest investors, join us at Billionaire’s Portfolio.   We have just exited an FDA approval stock for a quadruple.  And we’ll be adding a two new high potential billionaire owned stocks to the portfolio very soon.  Don’t miss it.  Join us here.

 

August 10, 2016, 4:00pm EST

After the past two weeks, that included a Fed decision, more BOJ action, the approval of Japanese fiscal stimulus, a rate cut and the return to QE for the Bank of England, and a strong jobs report, this week is a relative snoozer.

With that, every headline this week seems to contain the word Trump. Clearly the media thought a post by the former Fed Chairman, the architect of the global economic recovery and interventionist strategies that continue to dictate the stability of the global economy (and world, in general) today, wasn’t quite as important as Trump watching.

On Monday, Ben Bernanke wrote a blog post that laid out what appears to be his interpretation of a shift in gears for the Fed – an important message.  Don’t forget, this is also the guy that may have the most intimate knowledge of where the world has been over the past decade, what it’s vulnerable to, and what the probable outcomes look like for the global economy.  And he’s advising one of the biggest hedge funds in the world, the biggest bond fund in the world and one of the most important central banks in the world (at the moment), the Bank of Japan. And it’s safe to assume he still has influence plenty of influence at the Fed.

My takeaway from his post:  The Fed’s forward guidance of the past two years has led to a tightening in financial conditions, which has led to weaker growth, lower market interest rates and lower inflation.

Why?  Because people have responded to the Fed’s many, many promises of a higher interest rate environment, by pulling in the reins somewhat.

To step back a bit, while still in the midst of its third round of QE, the Fed determined in 2012, under Bernanke’s watch, that words (i.e. perception manipulation) had been as effective, if not more, than actual QE.  In Europe, the ECB had proven that idea by warding off a bond market attack and looming defaults in Spain and Italy, and a collapse of the euro, by simply making promises and threats.  With that in mind, and with the successful record of Bernanke’s verbal intervention along the way, the Fed ultimately abandoned QE in favor of “forward guidance.”  That was the overtly stated gameplan by the Fed.  Underpin confidence by telling people we are here, ready to act to ensure the recovery won’t run off of the rails — no more shock events.

The “forward guidance” game was working well until the Fed, under Yellen, started moving the goal posts.  They gave a target on unemployment as a signal that the Fed would keep rates ultra low for quite some time.  But the unemployment rate hit a lot sooner than they expected.  They didn’t hike and they removed the target.  Then they telegraphed their first rate hike for September of last year.  Global markets then stirred on fears about China’s currency moves, and the Fed balked on its first rate move.

By the time they finally moved in December of last year, the market was already questioning the Fed’s confidence in the robustness of the U.S. economy, and with the first rate hike, the yield curve was flattening.  The flattening of the yield curve (money moving out of short term Treasuries and into longer term Treasuries, instead of riskier assets) is a predictor of recession and an indicator that the market is betting the Fed made/is making a mistake.

And then consider the Fed’s economic projections that include the committee’s forecasts on interest rates.  By showing the market/the world an expectation that rates will be dramatically higher in the coming months, quarters and years, Bernanke argued in his post that this “guidance” has had the opposite of the desired effect — it’s softened the economy.

So in recent months, starting back in March, the Fed began dramatically dialing back on the levels and speed they had been projecting for rates.  It’s all beginning to look like the Fed should show the world they are positioned to well underestimate the outlook, rather than overestimate it, as it’s implied by Bernanke.  The thought?  Perhaps that can lead to the desired effect of better growth, hotter inflation.

This post by Bernanke is reversing some of the expectations that had been set in the market for a September or December rate hike by the Fed.  And the U.S. 10-year yield has, again, fallen back — from 1.62% on Monday to a low of 1.50% today.  Still, the Fed showed us in June they expect one to two hikes this year.  Given where market rates are, they may still be overly hawkish.

This is the perfect time to join us in our Billionaire’s Portfolio, where we  follow the lead of the best billionaire investors in the world.  You can join us here

 

August 9, 2016, 4:15pm EST

Yesterday we walked through some charts from key global stock markets.  As we know, the S&P 500 has been leading the way, printing new highs this week.

U.S. stocks serve as a proxy on global economic stability confidence, so when stocks go up in the U.S., in this environment, there becomes a feedback loop of stability and confidence (higher stocks = better perception on stability and confidence = higher stocks …)

That said, as they begin to capitulate on the bear stories for stocks, the media is turning attention to opportunities in emerging markets.  But as we observed yesterday in the charts, you don’t have to depart from the developed world to find very interesting investment opportunities.  The broad stock market indicies in Germany and Japan look like a bullish technical breakout is coming (if not upon us) and should outpace gains in U.S. stocks in second half of the year.

Now, over the past few weeks, we’ve talked about the slide in oil and the potential risks that could re-emerge for the global economy and markets.

On Wednesday of last week, we said this divergence (in the chart below) between oil and stocks has hit an extreme — and said, “the oil ‘sharp bounce’ scenario is the safer bet to close the gap.”

oil v stocks aug 1 2
Sources: Billionaire’s Portfolio, Reuters

Given this divergence, a continued slide in oil would unquestionably destabilize the fundamentals again for the nascent recovery in energy companies.

With that, and given the rescue measures that global central banks extended in response to the oil bust earlier this year, it was good bet that the divergence in the chart above would be closed by a bounce back in oil.
That’s been the case as you can see in the updated chart below (the purple line rising).

aug9 oil v stocks
Sources: Billionaire’s Portfolio, Reuters

At the peak today, oil had bounced 11% in just five trading days.  Oil sustaining above the $40 is key for the stability of the energy industry (and thus the quelling the potential knock-on effects through banks and oil producing sovereigns).  Below $40 is the danger zone.

In a fairly quiet week for markets (relative to last week), there was a very interesting piece written by former Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke yesterday.

Tomorrow we’ll dig a little deeper into his message, but it appears that the Fed’s recent downgrade on what they have been projecting for the U.S. economy (and the path of policy moves) is an attempt to stimulate economic activity, switching for optimistic forward guidance (which he argues stifled activity) to more pessimistic/dovish guidance (which might produce to opposite).

Remember, we’ve talked in recent months about the effect of positive surprises on markets and the economy.  We’ve said that, given the ratcheting down of earnings expectations and expectations on economic data, that we were/are set up for positive surprises.  Like it or not, that’s good for sentiment.  And it’s good for markets.  And it can translate into good things for the economy (more hiring, more investment, more spending).

The positive surprises have been clear in earnings.  It’s happening in economic data.  It looks like the Fed is consciously playing the game too.

This is the perfect time to join us in our Billionaire’s Portfolio, where we  follow the lead of the best billionaire investors in the world.  You can join us here

 

August 8, 2016, 3:45pm EST

Today we want to look at some key charts as we head into the week.

First, to step back a bit, as we started last week, we had some big market events ahead of us.  Japan was due to approve a big fiscal stimulus plan.  The Bank of England was meeting on rates and the U.S. jobs report was on the docket to wrap up the first week of August.

As we discussed Thursday, the BOE announced they’ve returned to the QE game.  Japan doubled the size of its stock buying plan.  And the jobs report came in Friday with another solid report.  As we thought, despite the volatility in the monthly numbers the media likes to overanalyze, the longer term trend continues to clearly argue the health of the job market is in good shape, and not a legitimate concern for the Fed’s rate path.

All together, the events of the week only solidified reasons to be long stocks.

Most importantly, stocks have been, and continue to be, a key tool for central bankers in this global economic recovery. They want and need stocks higher. A higher stock market provides fuel for economic activity by underpinning confidence and wealth creation, which encourages hiring, spending and more investment.

With that, as we’ve said, this is the sweet spot for stocks, where good news is good news for stocks (better outlook triggers capital flows out of cash and bonds, and into stocks), and bad news is good news for stocks (it triggers more stimulus).

When it comes to stocks, back on May 25th, we said “everyone could benefit by having a healthy dose of ‘fear of missing out.’  Stock returns tend to be lumpy over the long run.  When we you wait to buy strength, you miss out on A LOT of the punch that contributes to the long run return for stocks.”

Fast forward to today, and the S&P 500 has printed yet another new record high.

But the horse is not already out of the barn on global stocks (including U.S. stocks).

Let’s take a look at the chart on the S&P 500…

1us stocks
Sources: Billionaire’s Portfolio, Reuters

You can see, we’ve broken out in U.S. stocks (very bullish).

Next, in the UK, the place people were most afraid of, just a little more than a month ago, traded near 14-month highs today and is nearing a breakout to record highs, with support of fresh central bank easing from the Bank of England.

1 uk stocks
Sources: Billionaire’s Portfolio, Reuters

In the next two charts, we can see the opportunities to buy the laggards, in areas that have been beaten down on broader global economic concerns, but also benefiting directly from domestic central bank easing.

In the chart below, you can see German stocks have fallen hard from the highs of last year, but have technically broken the corrective downtrend.  A return to the April highs of last year would be a 19% return for current levels.

1german dax aug
Sources: Billionaire’s Portfolio, Reuters

In the next chart, Japanese stocks also look like a break of this corrective downtrend is upon us.  A return to the highs of last year would be a 25% run for the Nikkei.  As we discussed last week, the sharp ascent in the chart below from the lower left corner of the chart can be attributed to the BOJ’s QE program, which first included a 1 trillion yen stock buying program and was later tripled to three trillion (a driver of the run from around 15k to 21k in the index).  Last week, that stock buying program was doubled to six trillion yen.

1jap stocks
Sources: Billionaire’s Portfolio, Reuters

Given the trajectory of the charts above (global stocks), which both promote and reflect global confidence, and the given lack of consequence that QE has had on meaningful inflation, the world’s inflation-fear hedge, gold, looks like its run into brick wall up here.

1 gold
Sources: Billionaire’s Portfolio, Reuters

Remember, we have a convergence of fresh monetary policy in the world this year, with fiscal policy in Japan, and the growing appetite for fiscal policy in other key economies.  That’s powerful fuel for global economic growth, risk appetite and stocks.

This is the perfect time to join us in our Billionaire’s Portfolio, where we  follow the lead of the best billionaire investors in the world.  You can join us here